Greetings All,
I''m hoping for some help on evaluating this diamond. Ultimately I''m looking for around 1 ct or slightly bigger size for an engagement ring. I''ve been looking at Excel Diamonds since they have a very nice Tiffany replica that I''d like to pair with.
Round Brilliant
Carat: 1.13
Color: F
Clarity: SI1
Cut: Excellent
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: Strong Blue
Table: 56%
Depth: 62.2%
Crown: 35.0
Pavilion: 40.8
HCA Score: 1.6 Excellent
http://www.exceldiamonds.com/Loose_Round_Diamond-143/Loose_Round_1.13_Carat_F_Color_SI1_Clarity_diamond-426896.html
I was intrigued by the strong flourscence of this stone. I''ve heard differing opionions but I think that some sort of flourscence would be a bit more unique and I think my GF would love that.
I''m most concerned in that it seems like a lot of inclusions. Can anyone help with comments or opinions on this diamond? Should I continue looking? Should I move the ct size down closer to 1 to get better clarity like a VS2?
Thanks All for the help in Advance,
Tim
I''m hoping for some help on evaluating this diamond. Ultimately I''m looking for around 1 ct or slightly bigger size for an engagement ring. I''ve been looking at Excel Diamonds since they have a very nice Tiffany replica that I''d like to pair with.
Round Brilliant
Carat: 1.13
Color: F
Clarity: SI1
Cut: Excellent
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: Strong Blue
Table: 56%
Depth: 62.2%
Crown: 35.0
Pavilion: 40.8
HCA Score: 1.6 Excellent
http://www.exceldiamonds.com/Loose_Round_Diamond-143/Loose_Round_1.13_Carat_F_Color_SI1_Clarity_diamond-426896.html
I was intrigued by the strong flourscence of this stone. I''ve heard differing opionions but I think that some sort of flourscence would be a bit more unique and I think my GF would love that.
I''m most concerned in that it seems like a lot of inclusions. Can anyone help with comments or opinions on this diamond? Should I continue looking? Should I move the ct size down closer to 1 to get better clarity like a VS2?
Thanks All for the help in Advance,
Tim