Hi,
I posted some specs a few days ago on an Emerald Cut I put on hold at a local B+M.
1.50 F VS1
7.51x5.70x4.18
Depth 73.3%
Table 66%
Girdle: Thin to medium
Culet: none
Polish: VG
Symmetry: Good
Fluorescence: Faint
No crown measurements.
I believe this stone mostly fits in the 2A to 2B category, except for the depth % which is 3A (I think)
Maybe someone more familiar with the AGA criteria can explain to me what the potential downside of a larger depth % is.
I have looked at over a dozen stones and this one seemed to have a lot more sparkle than many I have seen. I would hate to pass it up because of a number that I do not understand very well.
I posted some specs a few days ago on an Emerald Cut I put on hold at a local B+M.
1.50 F VS1
7.51x5.70x4.18
Depth 73.3%
Table 66%
Girdle: Thin to medium
Culet: none
Polish: VG
Symmetry: Good
Fluorescence: Faint
No crown measurements.
I believe this stone mostly fits in the 2A to 2B category, except for the depth % which is 3A (I think)
Maybe someone more familiar with the AGA criteria can explain to me what the potential downside of a larger depth % is.
I have looked at over a dozen stones and this one seemed to have a lot more sparkle than many I have seen. I would hate to pass it up because of a number that I do not understand very well.