Help please with numbers

[honey22]

Just a quick question, I don''t have IS images yet, but these are both branded AGS Ideals. Can you guys tell me if there are any preferences just based on numbers. I intend to get IS images, but wanted to know what you would pick based on numbers. I don''t want to pick size over quality, but wonder if the numbers for one just stands out over the other. I know I am probably nit-picking but please humour me!

1. d - 61.9, table 54.1, ca 34.6, pa 40.6, thin girdle 0.76ct 5.88x5.82x3.62

2. d 61.6, table 54.6, ca 34.3, pa 40.7, thin girdle, 0.80ct 5.99x5.97x3.68

3. d 61.9, table 56.1, ca 34.6 pa 40.87 thin girdle, 0.7ct 5.74x5.70x3.54

Thanks guys!

 

[Skippy123]

The first one scored using this tool (which you might have used already) http://www.pricescope.com/cutadviser.asp

Factor Grade Light Return Excellent
Fire Excellent Scintillation Excellent
Spread or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 0.8 - Excellent within TIC range

and the 2nd one

Factor Grade Light Return Excellent
Fire Excellent Scintillation Excellent
Spread or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 1 - Excellent
within TIC range

and you can do the last for fun.

Anything scoring 2 or below is great and this tool is used to weed out bad performers; they all look great. IS images would be good. Maybe size and price would weed some out??

I would go for the biggest one if price is close to the others

 

[Lorelei]

My front runner would be the second one, but I would make my final choice by IS images.