shape
carat
color
clarity

Help!! Please take a look at this stone

johncai1

Rough_Rock
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
6
I am shopping for an engagement ring, and found this one from bluenile. With my limited knowledge on diamond, I think it's a good stone. Please take a look and let me know if you think this is a nice stone

Thanks in Advance

John

Carat weight 1.25
Shape Round
Cut Ideal
Colour F
Clarity VVS2
Length/width ratio 1.01
Depth % 62.0%
Table % 58.0%
Polish Excellent
Symmetry Excellent
Girdle Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet None
Fluorescence Faint
Measurements 6.90 x 6.85 x 4.26 mm
 
Gonna need more info than that to make any sort of assessment.
 
The issue with BlueNile is that they don't provide any of the necessary light performance data that you need to make a well-informed decision. As a result, many folks here (myself included) would steer you away from them for a one-time purchase.

At that price point, I was able to find two options very quickly at Whiteflash.

Both are larger than the stone you had picked, and are equally eye-clean.

1.303ct, D, SI1
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3408403.htm

1.333ct, G, VS2

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3408383.htm

Both of those have been vetted for exceptional performance, and would be preferred to your original pick (unless there is a reason you want the very high clarity - most would consider it overkill).
 
Definitely run it through the HCA and see how it scores to see if it should be considered or not. I also recommend asking BN for a picture, idealscope and aset image of the diamond and for them to verify it's eye clean. Granted, being VVS2, I am assured it will be, but it's definitely worth double-checking.

I was always weary of looking at diamonds without an actual image of it, because you never really know until you see it and analyze it for yourself.
 
crans223|1431017883|3873487 said:
I also recommend asking BN for a picture, idealscope and aset image of the diamond and for them to verify it's eye clean.

BN will not provide an Idealscope or ASET image.

It is why many here would say to avoid BN, unless you really know what you're doing, or have a lot of time to ship both ways.
 
RockyRacoon|1431019150|3873502 said:
crans223|1431017883|3873487 said:
I also recommend asking BN for a picture, idealscope and aset image of the diamond and for them to verify it's eye clean.

BN will not provide an Idealscope or ASET image.

It is why many here would say to avoid BN, unless you really know what you're doing, or have a lot of time to ship both ways.

Wowwww, that's insane. I can't believe they wouldn't do that for a customer. I mean I know they have provided a lot of people here with great diamonds, but definitely a flaw in customer service to those who, like myself, would want to see what a diamond looks like and analyze it before making such a big purchase.
 
crans223|1431019243|3873505 said:
RockyRacoon|1431019150|3873502 said:
crans223|1431017883|3873487 said:
I also recommend asking BN for a picture, idealscope and aset image of the diamond and for them to verify it's eye clean.

BN will not provide an Idealscope or ASET image.

It is why many here would say to avoid BN, unless you really know what you're doing, or have a lot of time to ship both ways.

Wowwww, that's insane. I can't believe they wouldn't do that for a customer. I mean I know they have provided a lot of people here with great diamonds, but definitely a flaw in customer service to those who, like myself, would want to see what a diamond looks like and analyze it before making such a big purchase.

BN is a VERY high volume retailer.

The subset of people who want light performance data is probably small compared to their target audience.

At this point, they've calculated that they don't need to provide any additional services to keep their model afloat. They estimate FY2015 net sales will be around $500 million.

They are certainly missing out on some business, though!
 
RockyRacoon|1430969675|3873311 said:
The issue with BlueNile is that they don't provide any of the necessary light performance data that you need to make a well-informed decision. As a result, many folks here (myself included) would steer you away from them for a one-time purchase.

At that price point, I was able to find two options very quickly at Whiteflash.

Both are larger than the stone you had picked, and are equally eye-clean.

1.303ct, D, SI1
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3408403.htm

1.333ct, G, VS2

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3408383.htm

Both of those have been vetted for exceptional performance, and would be preferred to your original pick (unless there is a reason you want the very high clarity - most would consider it overkill).


Thanks RockyRacoon. I will check out those two..
 
crans223|1431017883|3873487 said:
Definitely run it through the HCA and see how it scores to see if it should be considered or not. I also recommend asking BN for a picture, idealscope and aset image of the diamond and for them to verify it's eye clean. Granted, being VVS2, I am assured it will be, but it's definitely worth double-checking.

I was always weary of looking at diamonds without an actual image of it, because you never really know until you see it and analyze it for yourself.


Thanks crans223 for the advice
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top