DazzlingDave
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2008
- Messages
- 2
hi everyone again!
you gave me helpful feedback and i have another radiant set of numbers to give you. i am back just to see if, by the numbers, any one of these seems better than the other:
diamond 1:
7.64x7.27x5.06
2.5 ct
G
VS1
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Depth: 69.6
Table: 68
culet: none
girdle: extremely thin-medium
flourescence: faint
diamond 2:
7.55x7.53x4.95
2.3 ct
G
VS2
Polish: excellent
Symmetry: very good
Depth: 65.7
Table: 66
culet: none
gridle: slightly thick - thick
flourescence: none
the 2.5 really doesn''t look any bigger than the 2.3. but we love it more! it seems to have better light performance. I was concerned with the faint flourescence, but other posts of PS said a faint rating is of no concern. i am also concerned that the very thin girdle may be more prone to chipping, is that something to be worried about? also, what sorts of price per carat do you think i should be getting?
any other information is more than welcome! thanks again!
you gave me helpful feedback and i have another radiant set of numbers to give you. i am back just to see if, by the numbers, any one of these seems better than the other:
diamond 1:
7.64x7.27x5.06
2.5 ct
G
VS1
Polish: very good
Symmetry: very good
Depth: 69.6
Table: 68
culet: none
girdle: extremely thin-medium
flourescence: faint
diamond 2:
7.55x7.53x4.95
2.3 ct
G
VS2
Polish: excellent
Symmetry: very good
Depth: 65.7
Table: 66
culet: none
gridle: slightly thick - thick
flourescence: none
the 2.5 really doesn''t look any bigger than the 2.3. but we love it more! it seems to have better light performance. I was concerned with the faint flourescence, but other posts of PS said a faint rating is of no concern. i am also concerned that the very thin girdle may be more prone to chipping, is that something to be worried about? also, what sorts of price per carat do you think i should be getting?
any other information is more than welcome! thanks again!