Upgradable
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2004
- Messages
- 5,537
My DH has given the go ahead for me to reset my ering diamond with the caveat that this stops all of the smaller projects that I''m constantly working on. I''m not interested in upgrading my stone as I love it very much. But I''ve fallen in love with a Beverly K halo setting that incorporates all of the vintage features I like.
What I need help with is the sizing of the halo. My stone is a 1.4 I SI2 certified from HRD, diameter is 7.15-7.19. Pearlman''s has given me a great quote in 18k white gold, and they are getting info from BevK''s fabrication department about the completed dimensions. Julian said that they will probably increase the size of the halo melee in proportion to the center stone. That worries me because I don''t think that bigger would necessarily mean better. I love smaller melee and the way that you see the "sparkle" and not the stones themselves. Plus I really like the effect of a tiny halo (with the space, that''s one of the features I love) surrounding a bigger stone.
I guess I''d like your opinions on whether I''m making a mountain out of a mole hill? Should I not mess with the perspective and allow them to increase the melee, or should I request what I "think" I want. This would be so much more helpful if I could have Pearlman''s just send the ring to try on, but the only one they have in house is currently being set with a client''s stone (and Julian said it is smaller than mine, but not by how much).
I''ve attached the Beverley K setting, and I''ll attach a picture of my diamond in its current setting too. Thanks for your help!

What I need help with is the sizing of the halo. My stone is a 1.4 I SI2 certified from HRD, diameter is 7.15-7.19. Pearlman''s has given me a great quote in 18k white gold, and they are getting info from BevK''s fabrication department about the completed dimensions. Julian said that they will probably increase the size of the halo melee in proportion to the center stone. That worries me because I don''t think that bigger would necessarily mean better. I love smaller melee and the way that you see the "sparkle" and not the stones themselves. Plus I really like the effect of a tiny halo (with the space, that''s one of the features I love) surrounding a bigger stone.
I guess I''d like your opinions on whether I''m making a mountain out of a mole hill? Should I not mess with the perspective and allow them to increase the melee, or should I request what I "think" I want. This would be so much more helpful if I could have Pearlman''s just send the ring to try on, but the only one they have in house is currently being set with a client''s stone (and Julian said it is smaller than mine, but not by how much).
I''ve attached the Beverley K setting, and I''ll attach a picture of my diamond in its current setting too. Thanks for your help!
