RockyRacoon
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 1,315
moneyring|1406183955|3719637 said:LOL thanks for the replies, you guys are killing me!
I will double check with GOG and see how much black inclusions there are. Since I know her best (I hope!), I know she would go OCD if she saw a black inclusion on the side view despite it being eye clean on the top view. Another reason why I'm leaning towards the WF ACA is she has a size 3.5-4 finger and I'm planning to get a thin band (1.8 mm wide). Do you guys think having a 2+ ct diamond set on a thin band/finger is overkill to the point it might too funky or awkward proportional-wise?
For the 2.13, is there any concern with the medium fluorescence or the table being 58% (other threads I read tend to limit the table at 57%)? And what about the H&A picture, the hearts doesn't look crisp compared to the WF hearts. Should I be concerned about that?
As far as the 1.867, does anyone have any comments or anything to nit pick about that diamond? Or can I assume it's a great choice also.
diamondseeker2006|1406207344|3719739 said:Your gf said SI or higher. So I'd still go with this stone unless there are very visible black inclusions. I buy VS and up for myself, but anyone who says 1.8-2.1 cts and SI or higher clarity is really telling you that they hope for the 2 ct stone!!! All of the diamonds are fine, but as long as this stone meets HER clarity conditions, it would be the winner.