Help deciding..

[mrc001]

Hi - First post, but i''ve been reading for ages. I''m still confused though - i have 4 princess cut''s i''m choosing between. Any help would be great!!

the 4 GIA reports #''s are
15798383
16255627
15124280
15740583

thank you!!

 

[Lorelei]

Welcome to PS!

We can't really help without more info, we need detailed photographs of the diamonds and ASET or Idealscope images, plus all the proportions, can you post links to the diamonds if they are with an online vendor and the GIA reports please?

 

[mrc001]

Thanks.

I''ve only got the GIA reports so far - so I hope its enough to maybe narrow the choices down a little

1. 15798383
Square Modified Brilliant
Measurements: 7.23 x 6.96 x 4.90 mm
Carat Weight: 2.01
Color Grade: F
Clarity Grade: VS1
Proportions:
Depth: 70.4 %
Table: 71 %
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None

2. 15740583
Square Modified Brilliant
Measurements: 7.39 x 7.08 x 4.90 mm
Carat Weight: 2.03
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS1
Proportions:
Depth: 69.2 %
Table: 71 %
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None

3. 15124280
Square Modified Brilliant
Measurements: 7.12 x 6.86 x 4.90 mm
Carat Weight: 2.03
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS2
Proportions:
Depth: 71.4 %
Table: 72 %
Girdle: Slightly Thick to Very Thick
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Fluorescence: None
Comments: Additional clouds are not shown.

4. 16255627
Square Modified Brilliant
Measurements: 7.47 x 7.26 x 5.19 mm
Carat Weight: 2.23
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS1
Proportions:
Depth: 71.5 %
Table: 73 %
Girdle: Very Thin to Very Thick
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Good
Fluorescence: None
Comments: Pinpoints are not shown

 

[Ellen]

mrc, are these stones local, or are they online?


I''d skip the last two, we like to see at least Very Good on Symmetry, among other things.

The first is more square than the second, and the table to depth is a bit better, though we usually like to see the table smaller than the depth. But that is not a hard and fast rule. Could be ok.

So, with an IS pic, that''s about all I can offer.

 

[mrc001]

thank you for the feedback - thats helpful. i''m going to arrange to view each of them locally.