Help deciding between 3 Regents

[wifrbr]

Hello.

I need some help deciding on a Regent Diamond
Here are the 3 candidates

1.33
G
VS2
Depth 66.2
Table 61
L 6.59
W 6.57
D 4.35


1.53
F
SI1
Depth 67.5
Table 58
L 6.82
W 6.83
D 4.61


1.90
I
SI1
Depth 66.8
Table 61
L 7.35
W 7.36
D 4.92

I would appreciate anyones opinion

Thanks

 

[Mara]

do you have links?

we''d need more info, images etc to compare..esp with a regent.

 

[Kaleigh]

Can you post some pics or images of these regents, I would love to see them.

 

[LadyluvsLuxury]

I agree, pics would definitely help!

 

[wifrbr]

Here are 2 of the links
I don''t have one for the 1.33

http://www.goodoldgold.com/regent_1_53ct_f_si1.htm

http://www.goodoldgold.com/regent_1_90ct_i_si1.htm

Thanks

 

[LadyluvsLuxury]

Well, I am in no means an expert, just a diamond fiend

. But IMO I think they are both equally beautiful stones. From the pics the difference in color between the ''I'' and ''F'' was noticeable, however because I am a size girl and don''t see the point in paying extra for a D,E,F stone when I find G,H,I,J,K''s etc just as beautiful, I would personally go with the larger stone. However, if your preference is for the more colorless stone then the ''F'' is gorgeous as well.

 

[Kaleigh]

Well that was easy, go for the I SI1, bigger size and the I will face up very white. But both are gorgeous, but I'd go for the larger stone. Plus it's cheaper!!

 

[Mara]

The 1.53 has a ring of leakage under the table while the 1.90 does not. The 1.90 has a GREAT LS image...excellent.

From a light return perspective (and because it''s bigger and cheaper which is a big bonus for me!) ... I like the 1.90. Without a link to the 1.33...can''t say anything else.

Good luck!

 

[wifrbr]

Thanks everyone, any advice on how I should set a regent

 

[wifrbr]

Thanks.I am going to look at them tomorrow, I will let you know which one I pick

 

[valeria101]

Has the cut changes since the firts Regents? These looks more roundish to me.

And I second Mara about that fish eye circle - hopefully it only shows in pictures.

Couldn''t help lining up the pictures! (1.9 left, 1.5 right).

Are these non-round enough for a cushion shape? I can understand the attraction of a round-wit-a-twist too, and don''t know what you are looking for... just ''thought I''d ask. When at it, you might want to line them up with a H&A cushion - I don''t know if any on the list fits in the size and budget you are looking for, but perhaos the 1.7 cts J-VVS would. These cushions don''t seem to have such a hard time not showing that fish eye effect. Perhaps the color grade sounded ''scarry'' but in person it may turn out a nice surprise after all. Here''s the relevant portrait:

Against the 1.9 regent, this stone seems to be brighter too.

 

[valeria101]

Here''s what I was trying to say about the Regent shapes... If I remember it right, Mara mentioned this at some point too.