Good Emerald

[Themomo]

Hello,
Please share any and all thoughts on this diamond
. Shape: Emerald
. Carat: 0.51
. Depth %: 63.2
. Table %: 62
. Girdle: M-
. Measurements: 5.56-4.05X2.56
. Polish: Very Good
. Symmetry: Very Good
. Culet: None
. Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Crown Hieght 11.9%

Thanks

 

[Themomo]

More pics

 

[strmrdr]

yes it is, biggest downgrade is the off center culet with the ends being larger on one side than the other. (longer windmills) it would be a large problem in a larger stone but not very eye noticeable in that size.
Id say on a ex to poor scale its good too vg.

 

[Themomo]

More

 

[Themomo]

Last one

 

[strmrdr]

ASet image is weird and looks like it wasn't taken exactly right.
overall same opinion as before.
Comes down too how eye visible the off center culet/unequal ends are.
In a larger stone it would be enough to knock it out of consideration.

 

[diagem]

I think the culet is in place...., just the outline of the E/C is out of balance (the straight edges with the corners breaks are not in sync...)
The long edge tapers a bit...., no?

 

[chrono]

Everything about it looks great except for the symmetry. I can''t quite put my finger on it but I''m surprised it got a VG rating for symmetry. Perhaps it isn''t noticeable in real life size (not magnified)?

 

[Ellen]

Date: 8/9/2007 8:28:11 AM
Author: Chrono
Everything about it looks great except for the symmetry. I can''t quite put my finger on it but I''m surprised it got a VG rating for symmetry. Perhaps it isn''t noticeable in real life size (not magnified)?

Possibly it is because it was graded by EGL?