shape
carat
color
clarity

GIA Picture Explanation

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

KrWz

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
53
Hi guys. On a GIA Certificiate, is the left picture a view of the diamond from the top and is the right picture a view of the diamond from the bottom? I've seen pictures on rings where the one on the left (top view?) has little or no blemishes but the one on the right (bottom?) has a number of "feathers". If the majority of the blemishes are on what I think is the bottom of the diamond, is this better than it being on the top since the blemishes on the bottom can be hidden?
 
You are correct the top view (left) is flipped from 12 0''clock to 6 0''clock to produce the bottom view (right).

With an SI1 you would have to see the stone to determine if it were eye clean.
 

The picture you are describing is known as the plotting diagram or simply the plot. It’s intended to be a map for locating various attributes of the stone when examined under magnification. Right below the drawing should be a chart that gives a token explanation of what each of the varoius marks mean. The face up drawing should contain all of the features that are visible within the stone when viewed in the face up position. The back view should contain anything that is visible from the back that isn’t already noted in the other picture. If you see something on the back, but not the front, this should be visible only from the back. If it appears on the front, it may also be visible from behind.


It’s worth noting that this is a map, not a rendition of the diamond. The amount of ink used isn’t really the point. In drawing these pictures, it’s usually appreciated by the dealers to have a pretty light touch with the pen because customers flip out if there’s a lot of red in the picture. Most of us learned in elementary school that red marks on your paper are BAD. The thickness of the line and the saturation of the red color aren’t part of the program. Similarly, they don’t always illustrate everything in the stone. The plotter should include the ‘grade setting’ inclusions, which are the ones used in the decision to assign a particular clarity grade and they should include anything that will be useful in recognizing the particular stone but others are optional.


Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ISA NAJA
Independent Appraisals in Denver
 
Thanks for the great info guys!
 
Is it true that the GIA will not bother rating a badly cut diamond? I was informed by a jeweler that one can be assured that a diamond is of good quality because it is GIA certified and in addition the ratings on the cert are of high markings. The jeweler said the GIA is selective on the diamonds they will rate and even if the GIA rated a ''poor'' diamond than in the comments section of the GIA report they would specifically state that the diamond was a poor cut (too deep / shallow / etc etc). Could anyone confirm this? Thanks for the helpful info.

Denverappraiser I also PMd you on this. Thanks all~
 
GIA will grade whatever they''re paid to grade so I guess I disagree with your jeweler on this one. There are two things that can cause the effect you’re seeing. Firstly, GIA service is pretty expensive and no dealer is going to order up a report on a stone where the increase in their ability to sell doesn’t offset the price of the report. Basicallly this means that they don’t buy reports on cheap stones. Secondly, the dealers order the reports because they want to use it as and advertisement and to help them sell. Who wants to pay good money for an ad that says I2-P? This kind of stone is usually easier to sell without a lab exam and they can save the GIA fees as well as the time it takes to deal with it. It’s not GIA that objects to grading the lower quality stones, it’s the dealers.

Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ISA NAJA
Independent Appraisals in Denver
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top