Hello to everyone. This is my first post here and the first time I’m dealing with diamonds. I’m about to drop the question to my loved one and searching for a diamond was an exciting journey although frustrating at some points. After some research it comes down to these two diamonds graded by GIA.
Diamond 1
Carat: 0.46
Shape: Round Brilliant
Color Grade: H
Clarity Grade VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Clarity Characteristics: Crystal, Feather Finish
Fluorescence: None
Size: 4.93 – 4.95 x3.08 mm
Table: 55%
Crown Angle: 35⁰
Pavilion Angle: 40.6⁰
Crown Height: 16%
Pavilion Depth: 43%
Total Depth: 62.3%
Star: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle Thickness: 3.5%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Excellent
HCA Score: 0.9
Diamond 2
Carat: 0.46
Shape: Round Brilliant
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Clarity Characteristics: Crystal, Feather Finish
Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Size: 5.01 – 5.03 x 2.99 mm
Table: 60%
Crown Angle: 33⁰
Pavilion Angle: 40.8⁰
Crown Height: 13%
Pavilion Depth: 43%
Total Depth: 59.5%
Star: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle Thickness: 3.5%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
HCA Score: 1.4
The diamonds have the same price and I’m leaning towards Diamond 2 as it seems to have somewhat better characteristics. However I was wondering if Diamond 2 is discounted due to the medium blue fluorescence or due to its shallow cut. I’m not worried about the fluorescence however I’m not sure if the shallow cut has as impact on its visual performance. Its HCA score is excellent at 1.4 but I’m still cautious due to its shallow crown angle of 33⁰ and large table 60%. These make the diamond look bigger for the same carats but I’m not sure about its visual impact.
Diamond 1 has an HCA excellent score of 0.9 and it’s somewhat more standardly cut with a crown angle of 35⁰ and table 55%.
What is your opinion about these two diamonds?
Thank you for your time.
Diamond 1
Carat: 0.46
Shape: Round Brilliant
Color Grade: H
Clarity Grade VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Clarity Characteristics: Crystal, Feather Finish
Fluorescence: None
Size: 4.93 – 4.95 x3.08 mm
Table: 55%
Crown Angle: 35⁰
Pavilion Angle: 40.6⁰
Crown Height: 16%
Pavilion Depth: 43%
Total Depth: 62.3%
Star: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle Thickness: 3.5%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Excellent
HCA Score: 0.9
Diamond 2
Carat: 0.46
Shape: Round Brilliant
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Clarity Characteristics: Crystal, Feather Finish
Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Size: 5.01 – 5.03 x 2.99 mm
Table: 60%
Crown Angle: 33⁰
Pavilion Angle: 40.8⁰
Crown Height: 13%
Pavilion Depth: 43%
Total Depth: 59.5%
Star: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle Thickness: 3.5%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
HCA Score: 1.4
The diamonds have the same price and I’m leaning towards Diamond 2 as it seems to have somewhat better characteristics. However I was wondering if Diamond 2 is discounted due to the medium blue fluorescence or due to its shallow cut. I’m not worried about the fluorescence however I’m not sure if the shallow cut has as impact on its visual performance. Its HCA score is excellent at 1.4 but I’m still cautious due to its shallow crown angle of 33⁰ and large table 60%. These make the diamond look bigger for the same carats but I’m not sure about its visual impact.
Diamond 1 has an HCA excellent score of 0.9 and it’s somewhat more standardly cut with a crown angle of 35⁰ and table 55%.
What is your opinion about these two diamonds?
Thank you for your time.