- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
Nope, it doesn't look like Dave's stone. I guess we can rule out haziness. .Karl_K|1414593511|3774421 said:Per Garry this one is slightly hazy. You can sorta see the effect that is looks a bit like a steamy mirror.
![]()
Yes, I knew it will have SB fluor ,but I don't know what to look for or how it supposed to look under the sun.. .MissGotRocks|1414616384|3774629 said:DF, did you know or expect the stone to have fluorescence? I'm thinking you didn't - not sure how you feel about it overall.
Dancing Fire|1414626812|3774716 said:I knew it will have SB fluor ,but I don't know what to look for or how it supposed to look under the sun.. .![]()
when I get a chance I'll compare the Octavia with her non fluor RB stones.kenny|1414637629|3774802 said:Dancing Fire|1414626812|3774716 said:I knew it will have SB fluor ,but I don't know what to look for or how it supposed to look under the sun.. .![]()
IIRC, Mrs. DF has a round diamond.
If hers has no, or low, fluor examine them both side by side outside under direct sun.
Both will of course reflect lots of the blue sky, but look for any difference, such as oily or milky, or even any additional blue glow because of your VSB fluor.
I had a GIA med-blue fluor asscher and could not detect ANY difference when next to a no-fluro diamond under a clear blue sunny sky.
I suspect under sunlight they DO fluoresce blue BUT the reflection of the bright blue sky is so much brighter than the fluorescent glow that it overpowers the fluorescence ... much like standing in front of a loud blaring speaker column at a rock concert and trying to hear someone 10 feet away whispering to you.
I agree that if Jon said it is fine then it is fine ... and I'm probably the most non-trusting, cynical, skeptic, grumpy old man on earth.
I implicitly trust Jon's competence, education, experience, and honesty, even when lots of this miser's hard earned money is at stake.