Final decision on RB with Idealscopes - please help!

[squeeze1]

Hey all!

Please please please help me decide between these 3 options within the next 24 hours!

To be set in a Tiffany style solitaire.

Diamond #1:

0.8 ct
5.98 * 5.95
VVS2 I
Depth: 61.9
Table: 54.9
Crown: 34.3
Pav: 40.9
$4000

http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.801-i-vvs2-round-diamond-ags-104065663079 / http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.800-i-vvs2-round-diamond-ags-104072528005 (does one of these look any better than the other?





Diamond #2:

0.9 ct
6.17 *6.15
H SI1
Depth: 62.0
Table: 56.0
Crown: 35.0
Pav: 40.8
$4400

http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/0.90-carat-h-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-421900



Diamond #3:

0.9 ct
6.22 * 6.19
H SI1
Depth: 62.1
Table: 57.0
Crown: 35.5
Pav: 40.6
$4700

http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/0.91-carat-h-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-470832




Thanks!!!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

The last two stones are going to appear larger, so I would lean towards those. I like #3 best IF someone can tell you if the feather near the girdle will pose any durability risk for the stone. It seems to be very clean other than the feather.

 

[squeeze1]

Thanks DS.

Does anyone else have any input?

 

[pfunk]

I like #2 the most. Looks pretty clean in the video and I think it looks like it has more life than #3. It is also going to look the same size and is cheaper.

 

[tyty333]

The last two stones are going to appear larger, so I would lean towards those. I like #3 best IF someone can tell you if the feather near the girdle will pose any durability risk for the stone. It seems to be very clean other than the feather.

I would lean towards 2 or 3 to eek out a little more size (all the asets look good).

Ask JA to evaluate 2 and 3 and tell you what they see.

 

[thecat]

I prefer #2, #1, #3.