Date: 10/14/2005 12:37:29 AM
Author: dandoboy
I''m getting a strong sense of support for ACA over Eightstar here. I''m not sure if this sense is stemming from the negative attitudes towards certain stones or their prices, or from true, blind comparisons.
It''s unfortunate that everyone has an innate bias towards the world that is strongly affected by what they read and take in (I myself have been flip-flopping between being an ACA advocate and Eightstar fan like night and day, depending on what threads I''ve read, what pictures I''ve seen, or even for no apparent reason).
More comments would be welcomed with open arms.
Date: 10/14/2005 12:37:29 AM
Author: dandoboy
I''m getting a strong sense of support for ACA over Eightstar here. I''m not sure if this sense is stemming from the negative attitudes towards certain stones or their prices, or from true, blind comparisons.
It''s unfortunate that everyone has an innate bias towards the world that is strongly affected by what they read and take in (I myself have been flip-flopping between being an ACA advocate and Eightstar fan like night and day, depending on what threads I''ve read, what pictures I''ve seen, or even for no apparent reason).
More comments would be welcomed with open arms.
Another procedural option for comparing...you may be able to have either both sent at no cost to an independent appraiser for your review in their office, in advance of a purchase commitment. Or, it is likely that WF would do this, at least, saving you the need to purchase at least one of those two outright, before your final commitment.Date: 10/13/2005 10:25:11 PM
Author: dandoboy
I live in Canada (closest Eightstar dealer to me is a 6 hour drive to Upstate Michigan). I would have to buy both stones, examine them both side by side, and then decide. Unfortunately I don''t have the finances to buy two amazing stones, even if only for approval.
Lawmax you said it all in a nut shell. This short observation should apply to the way everyone looks at beauty and life in general for we all process things in our own way.Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder.![]()
Date: 10/14/2005 8:10:08 AM
Author: lawmax
Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder.
I think it''s important to understand that if you''re not seeing both stones, you are buying the beauty of the marketing story not the visual beauty of the brand you select. Not that there''s a problem with that - but understanding this may help with the decision.Date: 10/13/2005 10:25:11 PM
Author: dandoboy
Unfortunately I don''t have the finances to buy two amazing stones, even if only for approval.
That was my experence as well.Date: 10/14/2005 3:46:20 PM
Author: Giangi
I have seen an eightstar and wasn't THAT pleased. I must say I had high expectations. The arrows pattern was very evident and prnounced... almost too much actually... The black ''star'' looked quite distracting to me.. In my humble opinion of course.
Let me be up front and say that I went with the EightStar, so you know my bias. You may also want to look up my past posts to see where I''m coming from as, due to my criticism of them, I have a reputation on the forum of being "anti-Whiteflash" despite my being on good terms with some members of the management there. In light of this, feel free to give the testimony that follows whatever weight you feel it deserves.
I saw several of each brand side by side together with unbranded hearts and arrows diamonds when I was shopping for my wife''s engagement diamond a few years back. My jeweler carried both brands at the time and I was able to observe both in a variety of lighting conditions. I had also seen Hearts on Fire, Lazare Kaplan, and SuperbCert diamonds a few days prior to this.
With the naked eye, I didn''t observe much difference between the A Cut Above, Hearts on Fire, Lazare Kaplan, SuperbCert, and unbranded hearts and arrows. They were all beautiful diamonds but were similar in appearance.
The EightStar was noticeably different in direct lighting. I''ll explain how it looks so you can decide for yourself if it may appeal to you (to some it does, to others not). In direct lighting, the EightStars returned no white light (other than facet glare). They seem to convert pretty much 100% of light entering the diamond to rainbows.
Realize that this means that there is little, if any, white light returned in direct lighting. This leads to the "dark" appearance some in your thread have mentioned. For me, this is not unattractive (as it was to some who responded in the thread). The look is somewhat similar to the feeling of "depth" you get with some emerald cuts. Also keep in mind that it is not always dark in direct lighting, just that it is either dark or fireworks are going off.
In a sense, EightStars are at one extreme, opting for fire over white light return in direct lighting. Posters have mentioned that A Cut Aboves are "better balanced" by which I assume they mean that there is a mixture of white light and colored light return in direct lighting, which is true. This was true not only of the A Cut Aboves but all others I saw. Which look you prefer is really all a matter of taste.
The other major difference in the EightStars was that they were cut with wider pavilion mains. (The "new line" A Cut Aboves appear to be cut similarly). This changes the character of the diamond''s scintillation, leading to fewer but larger flashes of light. Again whether you prefer this to the smaller but more frequent flashes found in more traditional cuts is a matter of taste. The size of the diamond probably factors in here as well.
Several people in the thread have mentioned the "prominent black arrows" present in the EightStar. This makes me question whether they have actually seen these diamonds in person or just viewed pictures of them online. When viewed through an Ideal-Scope (or Firescope), the arrows appear black (reflecting the ocular placed above the table); when photographed head-on, the arrows appear black (reflecting the camera lens); but when viewed with the naked eye, the arrows do not appear black but instead reflect whatever light is coming in perpendicular to the table. You can, however make out the star pattern with the naked eye, as you can with many hearts and arrows diamonds.
As to the price, it has been said in the thread that EightStars are "twice as expensive" as A Cut Aboves. This may be true or it may be overstatement. When I priced them they were maybe 30-50% more than ideal cuts with similar stats. They may have gone up since or A Cut Aboves may have come down, but I would price them myself rather than get my prices secondhand.
Now to answer your question: If money were no object, I would choose the EightStar over the A Cut Above. In the case of "classic" A Cut Aboves, I know from direct experience that I prefer the look of the EightStar. In the case of "new line" A Cut Aboves, assuming that the look is similar to EightStar, and bear in mind I have never seen a "new line," I would still choose the EightStar since I feel it to be the "original" that the "new line" is copied from.
Just as Lazare Kaplan cut the first ideals early in the 20th century, EightStars were the first of the so-called superideals, predating the creation of both hearts and arrows diamonds and even the hearts and arrows viewer itself. They predate A Cut Above and Hearts on Fire by about a decade, if I am not mistaken. And while few Pricescopers would agree, I feel that there is value in the heritage of a diamond.
Also in the money-is-no-object category, I might also look into diamonds like the Solasfera (I''ve heard good things) and especially the so-called "Over Excellent" shallow-cut diamonds being produced in Japan by Hohoemi Brains, Inc. I also like the look of Context Cut diamonds and might move in that direction.
Now, if money were an object, I might be tempted to look at the "new line" A Cut Aboves, since these are undoubtedly less expensive than EightStars and may (or may not) be similar in appearance. But then, if money were an object I would probably pass on the A Cut Aboves and go with something from Whiteflash''s "Expert Selection" or another unbranded diamond as A Cut Aboves carry a premium of their own (on the order of 18% last I looked).
In the best of worlds, you would be able to look at all of these side by side, but I take it from your post that this is impossible. Be assured that both EightStars and A Cut Aboves are beautiful diamonds and you can''t really go wrong with either. Also keep in mind that there really is no such thing as a "best" diamond, only one that is best for you.
I hope this has been helpful. It''s likely a different opinion than you would get on the forum but maybe that isn''t such a bad thing.
Dandoboy, just curious what you meant by "a step beyond that."Date: 11/11/2005 11:19:52 AM
Author: dandoboy
the specific stone I found was ACA-quality and then a step beyond that!