down to 3 RBs, experts please chime in :)

[mgh]

currently returning a stone i had bought from an online vendor..i have narrowed it down to these 3 stones..any issues concerning measurements/%'s/steep deep concerns/etc..thanks again..hope to have this wrapped up this week


#1.(awaiting idealscope)

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1461961.asp

G, SI1, cut pol sym all EXC

measurements 6.41 x 6.43x3.96
1.02 ct
table 58
depth 61.7
crown 34
pav 40.8
lower girdle 75

hca under 2
ligh ret exc
fire exc
scin exc
spread vg

#2 (awaiting idealscope)
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1472009.asp

measurements 6.45 x 6.49x4.02
1.02 ct
table 54.2
depth 62.2
crown 35.2
pav 40.8
lower girdle 78

hca under 2
ligh ret exc
fire exc
scin exc
spread vg

and then diamond #3 (idealscope on first post, 2nd image)

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1444580.asp

measurements 6.36 x 6.41x3.99
1.00 ct
table 56
depth 62.5
crown 35
pav 40.8
lower girdle 75

hca under 2
ligh ret exc
fire exc
scin exc
spread vg

 

[OCgirl]

Stone #1
Cut looks good from the image alone. However, there's a feather in the dead center. Did JA mention it's eye clean and from how many inches?

Stone #2
The cut looks a bit funky. Not sure if it's bad photography or...? It's a AGS000 so it should be okay.

Stone #3
It's not as "clean" as I would want a 1 ct VS2 to be. Did you ask JA to check out the indented natrual? And is it eye clean? I do like the fat arrows though.

 

[mgh]

fixed the hyperlinks..hmm., once i get the idealscopes..ill throw them up here.