wishful
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- May 20, 2008
- Messages
- 723
Ditto!Date: 10/1/2008 1:47:00 PM
Author: trillionaire
Gwen, I think J should be happy that he is marrying a practical woman!![]()
Ditto!Date: 10/1/2008 1:47:00 PM
Author: trillionaire
Gwen, I think J should be happy that he is marrying a practical woman!![]()
I totally agree with you both! The only thing is that, in our case, there never was going to be a big wedding--the engagement ring was going to be the big splash-out event, so it''s between splurging on that or splurging on nothing at all, really. And since we''re an international couple, we''ve got more fees to worry about before we can get married.Date: 10/3/2008 9:42:26 AM
Author: Bia
I''m with Purrfectpear on this one. I am having a more difficult time trying to justify spending $40k on a wedding that will only last one day (hours really), than on a ring that can be worn forever and ever (and can be passed on to my children)--and Im not even engaged yet...HA!Date: 10/1/2008 12:14:55 PM
Author: purrfectpear
I can see spending several thousand on a ring a lot easier than I can on a wedding event.
Ring = tangible and forever.
Wedding = a few hours and some photos.
Assuming that it''s not a budget breaker I would spend on the tangible and cut back on the consumable.
I get what you''re saying though. It seems sort of trivial, since jewelry is not a necessity. However, I feel that if you can put a bit of money aside, AND it won''t put you in the red, then why not treat yourself to something beautiful! You definitely deserve it Gwennie...![]()