Tacori E-ring
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2005
- Messages
- 20,041
Hudson_Hawk said:puppmom said:It's so hard when they're cute! It sounds like you're doing the right thing by redirecting her.
I don't know if 1 is too early for timeout but, my best guess is, that you would probably just end up really frustrated because she might not *get it*. I think a better solution since Sophia is in the grabby stage (why oh why do they have to touch EVERYTHING?) is to keep everything you can out of her reach that you don't want her touching.
Sorry, no book recommendations - we're still on the Happiest Baby on the Block.![]()
Wait, Pupp, isn't your kid a teenager??
TravelingGal said:I laugh all the time. Because it gets funnier and funnier. Oh the ANGST they feel at 2! But I've gotten good at hiding it too. Just a twitch in the mouth for me now.
Just based on what you said here, two things:
1) Do a better job of getting her attention. I made Amelia jump when I used to call her name. She noticed. Could be that your kid is just really good at ignoring, but if you aren't already, REALLY make a point of punctuating her name.
2) Babies can't win - but sometimes it takes more time to get them to give up. You say she goes back to what she's doing. Pick her up and move her. And if she even INCHES in that direction again, pick her up and say no. Over, and over, and over again. She WILL give up at some point. But you have to be quick and consistent with not letting her go back to the undesired spot.
She can try all she wants, and be strong all she wants, but you are stronger. I know it's hard to keep an eye on your kid all the time, but try so she can't even make it to the DVDs. When she heads there, say "Sophia! No, not for Sophia!" and grab her. Half the battle is getting her to understand that it's futile to even TRY to get to the DVDs.
I didn't use time outs with Amelia until she was 20 months.
TravelingGal said:fiery said:I've read on different sites that 18 months is when you start doing time out because that's when they understand it. If I sat Sophia in a corner, I don't think she would understand.
Yeah, I agree. I started using timeout when Amelia could at least understand what she was doing wrong and tell me why she was in time out. In the beginning, timeout resulted for only two things: Hitting and throwing. She knew what those two words were. So when I asked her after her time in time out was over, "Why Amelia in timeout?" She would say "No throw" or "No hit." It was very effective, and I'm glad I didn't use it until I felt she could grasp the concept. It's been very highly effective and now even the threat of time out sets her straight.
Up until then, I know I did a lot in the "discipline" area, but all that really encompassed was saying something and meaning it. I never, ever let her win when I decided to pick the battle. Not once. I swear, that, more than anything has gone a long way into making the two's a lot easier. In the earlier days, I think the best thing you can do is teaching your kid that when mommy says something, she absolutely means it. NO EXCEPTIONS.
It's exhausting though, for sure...but the payoff is later! Because I'd hate to be teaching her that NOW when her stubborn streak and will are a LOT stronger.
Hudson_Hawk said:Mara, thanks for your post. This is clearly the line my mind takes on the subject as well. Kids do have some knowledge of cause and effect and consequences at a young age, so why would it not extend to this situation.
Blenheim said:Sabine - G will go for the "bad" stuff when we're distracted by other things, but I don't think it's to get our attention. I think it's more like, "Hey, if I splash in the dogs' water when Mama's watching she'll make me stop, so let's see if I can get away with it when she's not watching! Woohoo water!!" So if I can't adequately supervise, I try to remove the situation (put the dogs' bowl on the counter, use a baby gate to block off the area, etc) so that he learns that he can't play with dogs' bowl, no matter what.