Find your diamond
Find your jewelry
shape
carat
color
clarity

Diamond advice, thanks in advance.

Partial leakage under the table and arrows symmetry not up to standards. I would say the hearts patterning would definitely be wonky. That's why it isn't an ACA.
 
WF has strict criteria for all of there ACA stones, they must have both ideal light performance and ideal optical symmetry. The stone you are considering wouldn't qualify as a HA stone and is why it isn't considered one of their ACAs. Ideal optical symmetry isn't important to everyone and it's not necessary to achieve a well performing stone. You can have one without the other. I don't think that WF does video, but you could ask if they would be willing to do a short video comparison of this stone side by side with an ACA.
 
It does look to have slight leakage under the table but doent seem to be affecting the AGS light performance test.
Its a pretty good price. You could have a WF gemologist compare it against another stone and talk you through it. Or...
you could have the stone sent to you to have a look before being set (shipping will cost you) but may help with peace of mind.
 
Thanks everyone for the input, I'm always learning on pricescope.


I've been learning so much over the past few months and last night I finally thought I had a good stone for the price. So I asked Whiteflash to hold the stone last night. This morning they told me its not available any longer. It disappointed me but I guess that wasn't the right stone. Any suggestions, similar price and description. Should I go down in size to get the A Cut Above?
Thank you.
 
I don't know how to link from my kindle but WF has a 1.505 J SI1 ACA that looks really nice. You can check that out. I would also suggest checking out what Brian Gavin has listed in both his signature and blue line.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Jewelry Blog
PriceScope-Concierge-Ad
Find prime cuts.
Top