annesophie
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Messages
- 3
I think it''s shallow with a big table so if I were to guess I''d say it would tend to look larger, and possibly be brilliant, but not super firey. Other than that, and those are *guesses*, I don''t think it''s possible to know without looking. It''s *very* shallow though, but that means you have a large girth for the money assuming it was a bargain price.Date: 9/17/2006 3:21:26 PM
Author:annesophie
Calling all cushion experts. What do you think of these stats?![]()
G, VS1
1.37 cts
6.82x5.92x3.77
girdle: thick 5.5% faceted
table width 62%
crown height 13%
pav depth 45%
There are soo many different cushions out there, its difficult to compare.
All suggestions are greatly appreciated.![]()
I don''t know bergdorfs except that maybe somewhere in my head I''m thinking "overpriced" lolDate: 9/19/2006 7:19:49 AM
Author: annesophie
Thanks so much for the reply.I thought the same thing about the table. It didn''t have a classic cushion look. As for the depth, you think it was shallow? That could be. The jeweler said it looks like a 1.2 ct (cert says 1.37). So, it really looks smaller than it should? Where is the weight?? In the girlde?![]()
Sorry if these are dumb questions, I am new to this and I am just starting to look.
I have another question for all you PSers. During my last trip to NYC, I was ''just looking'' at Bergdorf Goodman''s and I saw a beautiful ring. I don''t know the name of the designer but it was hand made in platinum. Would you all stay away from buying in a dept store? The price I could get is comparable to what I see online (maybe a little more). I have seen stories on the jewelry mark-ups at dept stores and the quality is sub par (for the price they are charging). I guess what I am saying, is Bergdorf a safe bet?![]()