Choose between 2...please

[hunt7191]

Hi. Can you please weigh in on the better buy? My husband is no help in this one! Both are about 34k.

Stone 1: GIA Round 9.57-9.65-5.79
3.25 ct Depth 60.2 Table 61 Girdle: thin to slightly thick, faceted
Culet: very small Polish-G Symm- G SI1, color I Flour: faint Do not have the crown angle etc. Just the GIA with the above info


Stone 2: AGS Round 9.09-9.14-5.52
2.75 ct. Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0, Color: AGS 1 (F) Clarity: AGS 5 (SI1) Table 57% depth 60.5% upper angle (pavillion?) 34 lower angle 41.1 Faceted .7-1.2 Then there is a a depth for the top part of the stone at 14.5 and the bottom part of 43.4 Flour: Neg
I know it must frustrate the heck out of you that I am using terms like "top part of stone" but I mix up pavilion and crown etc and the chart doesn''t clarify. I am so sorry.

Again the 2 are priced virtually the same. I must admit that I am a size freak as this is an upgrade so not sure if there is a large variance between the dimensions. Thank you all so much!!!

 

[JulieN]

#2.

 

[JulieN]

new AGS?

 

[diamondseeker2006]

#2 without a doubt is the better stone. Stick with AGS0 and you''ll do well.

 

[MissGotRocks]

#2. Absolutely.

 

[mrssalvo]

no question..#2..

 

[hunt7191]

The AGS is 3 years old. Is that good/bad?

 

[JulieN]

err..not as good. but it''s still better than the first one.

 

[username]

Most likely,

#1 is bigger and less sparkly

#2 is smaller and more sparkly

Two totally different diamonds, depends on what you want. My pref would be #2, but I''m a sparkle freak. My friend''s fiance would choose #1 all day long, she''s a size freak. I feel an inappropriate analogy coming on, so I''ll quit while I''m ahead.