cinnamon013
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Messages
- 1,701
What do you think of these measurements?
Depth: 61.9%
Table: 56%
Crown Angle: 34.5
Pavilion Angle: 40.8
Lower Girdle %: 75%
Medium to Slightly thick faceted
Dimensions: 6.52-6.54 x 4.04mm
J SI1 eyeclean
Faint fluorescence
1.06 ctw
GIA
Symmetry: Excellent
Polish: Excellent
The stone I have currently has the following measurements:
Depth %: 61.8
Table %: 55.8
Crown Angle: 34.8
Crown %: 15.4
Star : 50
Pavilion Angle: 40.7
Pavilion %: 42.9
Lower Girdle %: 76
Girdle: Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted
Measurements: 6.04-6.05X3.73
F VS2
.831 ctw
Light Performance: 0
AGS
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Culet: Pointed
Fluorescence: Negligible
I know some of you have preferred measurements even within the top rated stones. Is there anything that stands out as a red flag on the larger stone? It looks great on the HCA, but I don’t have any photos of it.
Would I notice the difference in size?
It only has a crystal marked on the plot and is said to be eyeclean.
Comments? Thanks in advance...
Depth: 61.9%
Table: 56%
Crown Angle: 34.5
Pavilion Angle: 40.8
Lower Girdle %: 75%
Medium to Slightly thick faceted
Dimensions: 6.52-6.54 x 4.04mm
J SI1 eyeclean
Faint fluorescence
1.06 ctw
GIA
Symmetry: Excellent
Polish: Excellent
The stone I have currently has the following measurements:
Depth %: 61.8
Table %: 55.8
Crown Angle: 34.8
Crown %: 15.4
Star : 50
Pavilion Angle: 40.7
Pavilion %: 42.9
Lower Girdle %: 76
Girdle: Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted
Measurements: 6.04-6.05X3.73
F VS2
.831 ctw
Light Performance: 0
AGS
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Culet: Pointed
Fluorescence: Negligible
I know some of you have preferred measurements even within the top rated stones. Is there anything that stands out as a red flag on the larger stone? It looks great on the HCA, but I don’t have any photos of it.
Would I notice the difference in size?
It only has a crystal marked on the plot and is said to be eyeclean.
Comments? Thanks in advance...
