I'm curious about your thoughts on this. I have an ACA diamond bought from Whiteflash which is eligible to be upgraded at BGD (bought in fall 2007). The policy as currently written on the website states that BGD Signature stones (the functional equivalent) can be applied as follows: for signature stones, "Apply the original purchase price (less shipping) towards your upgrade and pay the difference." For trading in a Blue, it's apply 95% of the original purchase price (less shipping) toward the upgrade. Nothing in here says that you must be upgrading to purchase a Signature or Blue stone, right? As long as you have an "upgradable stone," you apply it toward "your upgrade."
Anyway, I've been told that there's a "new policy" that only credits you 80% of the original purchase price if you are buying a Select stone (which is a virtual stone meeting the criteria to be considered "Select," not an "everything else" virtual stone). And I was told that after I've already paid to ship and insure the original e-ring, which is in transit. And since I'd be taking a 20% hit on the stone and no credit for the setting, now I might as well have just sold the ring myself (in fact, since diamond prices have gone up, a diamond with the same specs sells for 45% more than what I paid for it initially, and I'd likely have made money). Am I off-base to be frankly annoyed by this? And not being told about this "policy change" during my discussions with the sales rep and at the time I was given the return authorization number?
Anyway, I've been told that there's a "new policy" that only credits you 80% of the original purchase price if you are buying a Select stone (which is a virtual stone meeting the criteria to be considered "Select," not an "everything else" virtual stone). And I was told that after I've already paid to ship and insure the original e-ring, which is in transit. And since I'd be taking a 20% hit on the stone and no credit for the setting, now I might as well have just sold the ring myself (in fact, since diamond prices have gone up, a diamond with the same specs sells for 45% more than what I paid for it initially, and I'd likely have made money). Am I off-base to be frankly annoyed by this? And not being told about this "policy change" during my discussions with the sales rep and at the time I was given the return authorization number?