Can someone please help me

[Higgsr1]

I just wanted to know someone elses opinion on which diamond is better. They are all aca and according to the vendor the si1 are eye clean up to 6 - 10 inches of your face. the prices are 3100, 3363 and 3600 Also does the table seem to small in the first diamond in relation to its depth. it scored a 1.2 on hca which was lower than the 2nd diamond at 1.5. any thoughts. i would appreciate it. Thanks


.813 .811 .815

Color G F G

Clarity SI1 SI1 VS2
5.98-6.02X3.71 5.97-6.06X3.68 5.95- 5.99X3.71

Table 54.6 56.1 55.1

Depth 61.8 61.5 62

Polish Ideal Ideal Ideal

Sym Ideal Ideal Ideal

Thin to Medium Faceted Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted

Culet Pointed Pointed Pointed

Fluor Negligible Negligible Negligible

 

[stone-cold11]

Put up the ASET,40x and hearts images.

HCA is just a rejection tool, score below 2 is a good candidate, a lower score is not a better one after that.

 

[Lorelei]

Hey Higgs, can you keep it to one thread please - it gets confusing with multiple threads asking the same thing, thank you!

 

[Higgsr1]

yes i There is a link to the 3 diamonds in the diamond hangout forum. I will stay with that posting. Sorry.

 

[Higgsr1]

http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds/Compare_Diamonds.aspx?idnos=2178301,2150724,2183251#

 

[Ellen]

If eyeclean, I''d go with the G SI1. They''re all great, but basically all the same size, and color difference will not be noticeable. Might as well go for the least expensive.

 

[Higgsr1]

yea i like the g si1. do you think that it is too deep of a diamond or that i will look smaller than other .81''s Im just asking becasue the table% seems alittle lower. Any comments

 

[stone-cold11]

Nope, the face up dimensions are about the same as the F SI1.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/2/2009 12:41:21 PM
Author: Higgsr1
yea i like the g si1. do you think that it is too deep of a diamond or that i will look smaller than other .81's Im just asking becasue the table% seems alittle lower. Any comments

No its fine, nothing to worry about - look at the diameter measurements to compare face up size, they all have similar diameters.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 10/2/2009 12:48:57 PM
Author: Stone-cold11
Nope, the face up dimensions are about the same as the F SI1.

Yep, it''s not too deep and the table''s just fine. You are looking at some of the best of the best, no worries.

 

[Higgsr1]

My only other worry is that inclusion toward the center of the stone. But i was told it was eye clean.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/2/2009 12:52:28 PM
Author: Higgsr1
My only other worry is that inclusion toward the center of the stone. But i was told it was eye clean.

You should be fine, if you are worried double check with WF that the inclusion isn''t eyevisible, they will be honest with you.

 

[Higgsr1]

one last question should i be conserned about the feathering on this diamond. One is close to the edge of the diamond and another is on the bottom of the diamond. I know feathers are cracks and i dont want the diamond to break

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/2/2009 1:27:33 PM
Author: Higgsr1
one last question should i be conserned about the feathering on this diamond. One is close to the edge of the diamond and another is on the bottom of the diamond. I know feathers are cracks and i dont want the diamond to break

Check with WF concerning the feather but I am sure you will find there won't be an issue, if you are worried then get an independant appraiser to inspect the diamond during the return period, you can find an appraiser in your area here.

 

[Higgsr1]

Ok thanks so much for all your help.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/2/2009 4:49:10 PM
Author: Higgsr1
Ok thanks so much for all your help.

You are most welcome!