can someone help with these 2 diamonds

[cactus88]

Hi,everyone i did some diamond research and somehow narrowed down the following three, please, any oponion are appreciated

1. 0.77C, E,VS1, no ASET images

http://www.eternitybyyoni.com/diamond_detail.php?id=946760


2.0.75c, E, VS1, ASET images got from vendor
http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-4634012-0.75-carat-Round-diamond-E-color-VS1-clarity.aspx

this is quoted from email:

This diamond is available and has very very small white inclusion in the pavilion which reflects in the in the crown of the table but its not visible to the naked eyes hence its a 100% eye clean diamond

3. 0.8c, F, VVS2, no ASET IMAGES

http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-5024978-0.80-carat-Round-diamond-F-color-VVS2-clarity.aspx

BUT accordingvendor's email,
As per gemologist comments, the diamond is a beautiful diamond with very good fire & scintillation in it which makes it a worth to go for. Unfortunately the images for this diamond is not available as our diamond partner does not have the mechanism to provide those images.

 

[Gypsy]

Is there a reason you are looking at such high color and clarity?

 

[Gypsy]

Did you run the HCA?

 

[cactus88]

all HCA are below 2..cant remember how much score each

En...it somehow makes me feel high color with high clarity good quality?

 

[tyty333]

all HCA are below 2..cant remember how much score each

En...it somehow makes me feel high color with high clarity good quality?

Are you sure you used the correct numbers on the HCA? Try running that first stone again.

 

[cactus88]

you were right,
i possibly used pavilion 40.8 instead of 41.8

1. HCA 6.0

2. 0.75 C, E,VS1, 1.9 -vg-ex-vg-vg

3.0.8C,F, VVS2, 1.7 ex-ex-ex-vg

looks like the third one is better even though without ASETs

 

[CanuckAB]

No, #2&3 are both <2 so are worth consideration. A lower score doesn't make a better diamond. Any score <2 is a pass and you then request idealscopes etc.

I personally like higher crowns so I quite like #2.