Odilia
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
- Messages
- 1,621
That is the problem: to me they look very different, but as far as I know the only "technical" difference is the fluorescence.Date: 5/10/2008 9:43:36 PM
Author: Gypsy
I think as long as they are well matched to the eye I shouldn''t matter.
It could be the setting, it could be the stones. I would just take it back, tell them it looks unmatched and have them try to explain it to you. Is this Quest? If it is, I''m sure they will be good about it. Good luck honey!Date: 5/10/2008 9:48:10 PM
Author: old-fashioned girl
That is the problem: to me they look very different, but as far as I know the only ''technical'' difference is the fluorescence.Date: 5/10/2008 9:43:36 PM
Author: Gypsy
I think as long as they are well matched to the eye I shouldn''t matter.
THanks Gypsy. I hope Quest can figure it out. If it is the setting, I guess I am just stuck.Date: 5/10/2008 10:24:40 PM
Author: Gypsy
It could be the setting, it could be the stones. I would just take it back, tell them it looks unmatched and have them try to explain it to you. Is this Quest? If it is, I''m sure they will be good about it. Good luck honey!
Yes, I have thought of both of those. My fear is that it's the angle at which they are set. If it's the angle or the bezel, I guess I am stuck with a very expensive but totally disappointing ring. (Unless changing that bezel into prongs - if it's possible w/o making it look weird - would help?) This is why I should not have gone custom, or at least I should have gone with a custom vendor who has a re-do/credit or return policy. I feel like such an idiot. I tried on SO MANY 5 stone rings over the past 2 years, and never saw any of these types of problems. And the angle at which the diamonds are set doesn't look that different from some of the ones I've tried on in stores, but they don't look this way. (And I have taken this ring into the store to compare in the same conditions.) I figured, what can go wrong? Plus if the hinged shank can't work out, I don't want my good diamond in this ring anyway. And I am so disappointed that I blew my reset budget on this; I am back to square one. I have to either put my good diamond back in the solitaire setting or else that other one I wear w/ the tiny melee that I asked about on the other thread. I am just deathly afraid of changing that little ring, because so many stupid and unforseen things can go wrong, and if I ruin that one, I will be really sick.Date: 5/10/2008 11:30:07 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Could it be the angle at which they are set? Or perhaps the bezel holding them is reflecting and making the dark spots?
It doesn't seem like it. The impression I get talking to them is that the ring is the way it is; they can only tweak minor things. Like, he maybe could replace the diamonds, but if it's the angle at which they are set, I don't think they'd remake the ring to fix that- if I thought they would, I might have more hope. It seems like, "this is the design you picked, and this is one of the unforseen downsides; tough luck." Maybe I am wrong; Pete does seem to want to make it right, so maybe I should just be more optimistic. Wish I could get it done quicker but there are always delays (on my end - except for the appraisal), so I always dwell on it and get pessimistic...Date: 5/12/2008 3:59:18 PM
Author: Gypsy
Why would you be stuck? They can fix it either way. If it's not right, it's not right.
Thanks, Catmom. I wish we could too. Maybe Pete can figure it out & fix it.Date: 5/11/2008 9:55:00 AM
Author: Catmom
OFG, I have several rings that when under a blacklight the mele has varying degrees of fluorescence but when looked at in normal lighting conditions look perfectly matched. I don''t see any darkness in the fluorescent stones. I wish you could figure out why you see such a difference.
Thanks, Isaku5! That is interesting, about how he warned you that the sidestones had to match re: fluoresence - that gives me hope that that may indeed be the problem. I agree with you that if that is the problem, he will replace those stones with others. I hope it is that simple! There are other things that don''t look right to me too, and I guess I always just fear that there may be no solution to those, w/o remaking the ring. But hopefully I''m wrong. I wish I could get there and talk them over with Pete sooner, but he wanted me to get the appraisal first, and I got it ASAP, but now it''s over a week since my appointment, and still no appraisal paperwork, so everything is on hold. But your post gives me some reassurance!Date: 5/12/2008 5:08:50 PM
Author: isaku5
I don''t think you should worry about Pete not wanting to fix a problem with fluoresence (if that''s what the problem turns out to be). A couple of years ago now, I almost bought an asscher with strong fluoresence. When I mentioned the fluor to Pete, he warned me that he''d have to search for sidestones which had flour, in order for centre to look right. I was very concerned about that; however, fate intervened, as it often does, and I wasn''t able to go ahead with the purchase.![]()
The point I''m finally gretting to is that Pete was very aware of the effects of fluoresence, and I''m betting he will be anxious to please you.
If something doesn''t look right to you, by all means have it looked after right away as every time you look at your ring, you''ll see the problem.![]()
Good luck!