LisainCalifornia
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2006
- Messages
- 8
Hello all,
I am in the process of changing my eternity ring. It is a channel set platinum ring (1 ct.) with engraved filigree on the sides. I got it about 3 years ago, but I had a common problem---I got it a bit too tight. I like to wear my rings loose, and was very use to my basic gold wedding band that I had worn for years that was a very loose fit. This one never felt comfortable, especially in the hot summer months or after one too many late night runs for Ben and Jerry's Brownie Batter. I need a ring that makes me feel skinny--not a ring that squeezes me like a pair of jeans left in the dryer too long!
I am not an engagement ring wearing type of person. I know, my mother must have dropped me on my head as a baby. I am a band type of girl--a GAP jeans, Naot sandals, white gauzy peasant shirt with a silk kimono. Wearing a eternity band is just me. I like the stones to go all the way around so that I don't have to worry about spinning it the right way, and I can wear it loose. I never take my wedding ring off--unless it is squeezing me and telling me I am chubby, then I want to chuck it in the daisy patch.
So I went to back to Simayof where we bought the naughty squeezy ring and they said they are happy to take our money and do an upgrade. Capitalism at it's finest. I tried on almost every ring in the store. I thought I wanted a Tacori eternity band with scalloping--and it is indeed beautiful. Esthetically I can appreciate the intricate work of the carving and scalloping work, and the diamonds that encircle the ring. But then I tried on a pave set eternity ring. Not too wide. About 1.25 ct. I am entraced by the sheer "sparkaliciousness" (yes, an appropriately made up word) of the ring. It is so much more sparkly than my channel set or the Tacori. I hate to be a sparkle whore, but baby give me some of that! And it is thin and flush with my finger--not all like a washer pipe like some eternity rings. I love that you don't see the side profile at all.
But I am wondering what others think here about the pave setting? Part of me balks at it--simple because my mom has this totally Heinous pave ring that she got in Vegas and it just screams "Florida retirement community". But this ring is not that. The other thing is that it almost seems sacreligious to break up diamonds in to those tiny peices just so you can pave the ring in sparkle. But It is just so pretty and comfortable. I slip it on and it feels like me.
I appreciate any opinions. I will post a pic of a similar ring:
Thanks for reading!
Lisa

I am in the process of changing my eternity ring. It is a channel set platinum ring (1 ct.) with engraved filigree on the sides. I got it about 3 years ago, but I had a common problem---I got it a bit too tight. I like to wear my rings loose, and was very use to my basic gold wedding band that I had worn for years that was a very loose fit. This one never felt comfortable, especially in the hot summer months or after one too many late night runs for Ben and Jerry's Brownie Batter. I need a ring that makes me feel skinny--not a ring that squeezes me like a pair of jeans left in the dryer too long!
I am not an engagement ring wearing type of person. I know, my mother must have dropped me on my head as a baby. I am a band type of girl--a GAP jeans, Naot sandals, white gauzy peasant shirt with a silk kimono. Wearing a eternity band is just me. I like the stones to go all the way around so that I don't have to worry about spinning it the right way, and I can wear it loose. I never take my wedding ring off--unless it is squeezing me and telling me I am chubby, then I want to chuck it in the daisy patch.
So I went to back to Simayof where we bought the naughty squeezy ring and they said they are happy to take our money and do an upgrade. Capitalism at it's finest. I tried on almost every ring in the store. I thought I wanted a Tacori eternity band with scalloping--and it is indeed beautiful. Esthetically I can appreciate the intricate work of the carving and scalloping work, and the diamonds that encircle the ring. But then I tried on a pave set eternity ring. Not too wide. About 1.25 ct. I am entraced by the sheer "sparkaliciousness" (yes, an appropriately made up word) of the ring. It is so much more sparkly than my channel set or the Tacori. I hate to be a sparkle whore, but baby give me some of that! And it is thin and flush with my finger--not all like a washer pipe like some eternity rings. I love that you don't see the side profile at all.
But I am wondering what others think here about the pave setting? Part of me balks at it--simple because my mom has this totally Heinous pave ring that she got in Vegas and it just screams "Florida retirement community". But this ring is not that. The other thing is that it almost seems sacreligious to break up diamonds in to those tiny peices just so you can pave the ring in sparkle. But It is just so pretty and comfortable. I slip it on and it feels like me.
I appreciate any opinions. I will post a pic of a similar ring:
Thanks for reading!
Lisa

