shape
carat
color
clarity

Are they good enough (need to decide tomorrow)

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

Hoos

Rough_Rock
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
16
1. G VVS2 1.61
Measurements: 7.53 - 7.57 x 4.63 mm


Carat Weight: 1.61


Color Grade: G


Clarity Grade: VVS2


Proportions:

"
Depth: 61.3 %


Table: 56 %


Girdle: Thin to Medium, Faceted


Culet: None


Finish:


Polish: Excellent


Symmetry: Excellent


Fluorescence: None

Additional Information


Crown Angle: 34.5°


Crown Height: 15 %


Pavilion Angle: 40.8°


Pavilion Depth: 43 %


Star length: 55 %


Lower Half: 80 %


Cut Grade: Excellent

Comments: Additional clouds are not shown.





2.****************************************************************************
1.62 GVS1




Measurements: 7.56 - 7.59 x 4.64 mm


Carat Weight: 1.62


Color Grade: G


Clarity Grade: VS1


Proportions:


Depth: 61.3 %


Table: 57 %


Girdle: Thin to Medium, Faceted


Culet: None


Finish:


Polish: Excellent


Symmetry: Excellent


Fluorescence: None




Additional Information


Crown Angle: 34°


Crown Height: 14.5 %


Pavilion Angle: 41°


Pavilion Depth: 43.5 %


Star length: 55 %


Lower Half: 80 %


Cut Grade: Excellent

Comments: Clouds are not shown.






I''ll see above stones tomorrow (in store) Are they good enough? The first one is better,rt?

"Comments: Additional clouds are not shown." What does it mean? No clouds? or There are few clouds?


Please help me make a decision.Thank you
 
They both look good on paper. Pick the one you like better.

It means there are some very small clouds, but it isn''t shown on the diagram because they are very small.
 
By the numbers alone, they both look good. They both scored below a 2 on the HCA (first one got a 1.2 ex/ex/ex/vg and the second one got a 1.4 ex/ex/vg/vg) so let your eyes be the judge when you see them in person tomorrow. Look at them individually under different lighting conditions and see which one you prefer. I think they''ll both be lovely.
1.gif
 
Big thanks to JulieN and gwendolyn

The diamond will be set in a 4-prong setting. Will Thin to Medium girdle cause a issue ? In any event, I really don''t want to lose or chip a stone.
 
No, that''s good. Just buy insurance.
 
just going by the #''s.......i''ll take door #1
 
See which one you like best, did you specifically want VVS clarity? You may know you could drop to VS or even SI in some cases, but it is a personal choice. '' Additional clouds not shown or clouds not shown" is a common remark you may find in the comments section of a grading report, to plot them would make the clarity plot look unecessarily busy and possibly offputting, so as they have no impact and can''t be seen, they are just mentioned for the sake of completeness.
 
Date: 5/23/2008 7:26:15 PM
Author: Hoos
Big thanks to JulieN and gwendolyn

The diamond will be set in a 4-prong setting. Will Thin to Medium girdle cause a issue ? In any event, I really don''t want to lose or chip a stone.
This really depends on the wearer - is she hard on her rings etc? and, it has also be said by others, to an extent on luck - if a diamond sustains a hard hit on just the right spot, it could chip regardless of the girdle.

That said, thin to med is, in my understanding, desirable - as was mentioned, just be sure its insured for real peace of mind
1.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top