shape
carat
color
clarity
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. PriceScope Upgrade Completed
    For issues, questions and comments click the link below
    https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/pricescope-upgraded-comments-and-issues.229551/

    Dismiss Notice

Archive reveals how British 18th century couples got married

Discussion in 'Ladies in Waiting' started by Winks_Elf, Feb 12, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Winks_Elf
    Brilliant_Rock
    Trade

    Messages:
    1,567
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    by Winks_Elf » Feb 12, 2009
    I thought the LIW here would find this article interesting:

    The traditional white wedding isn''t so very old after all, according to a vast new set of online family history records.

    In fact, the bride used to wear blue.

    It''s just one of the surprising facts to be turned up as more than three and a half centuries of marriage licenses become available on the internet.

    The London Marriage Licences, 1521-1896, detail more than 25,000 weddings that took place over a 350-year period of British history.

    Publication comes just as new figures show the number of British people getting married is at an all-time low.

    The database, which can be searched via genealogy website Ancestry.co.uk, reveals stark differences between a typical 18th-century wedding and today''s "traditional" wedding ceremony:

    • Brides in the 18th century typically wore multi-coloured dresses, or blue gowns (to represent purity). The famous ''white wedding'' did not become popular until Queen Victoria chose to wear white when she married Prince Albert of Saxe.

    • The wedding cake of today was predated by the ''bride''s pie'', commonly filled with savoury meat or sweet mince. The lady who found the glass ring concealed inside was thought to be next in line for marriage.

    • Wedding rings, an important part of the marriage ceremony since ancient times, became mandatory for the bride under the 1753 Marriage Act - though it was a De Beers advertising campaign 200 years later that popularised the idea that men should present a ring when they proposed.

    The collection documents the upsurge of church marriages held after the Act made marriage licences compulsory in an attempt to curb the growth of common-law marriage in the larger cities.

    In London, bogus priests had often turned a blind eye to bigamy and under-age marriage by conducting so-called ''Fleet Marriages'', named after the notorious area around Fleet Prison in Farringdon.

    Family historians will pounce on the new data. Marriage licences typically contain details of the bride and groom as well as their parents or witnesses - the kind of information that has previously only been readily available for the period from 1837 onwards, when central registration of marriages began.

    Before 1837, clergymen were not obliged to keep marriage certificates, which were often lost or destroyed - making originals extremely rare.

    Around 25,000 surviving London marriage licenses, which contain the details of around 100,000 individuals, have been digitized and are now fully searchable online.

    Among the famous names who appear in th records are satirical artist William Hogarth, Oliver Cromwell''s commander-in-chief Thomas Fairfax, and Robert Walpole, the first Prime Minister of Great Britain, whose father''s marriage is listed.

    Olivier Van Calster of Ancestry.co.uk said: ''These records will be of great value to anyone interested in or researching their family history as they contain such rich information and stretch far back beyond early UK census records.''
     
  2. nail_polish
    Shiny_Rock

    Messages:
    169
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    by nail_polish » Feb 12, 2009

    So neat!

    I love reading about how traditions came about! :)

    Thanks for sharing :)

     
  3. tlh
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    4,511
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    by tlh » Feb 12, 2009
    Love the info about the blue dress! THANKS Winks! [​IMG]
     
  4. kittybean
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    4,125
    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    by kittybean » Feb 12, 2009
    So cool to read about! Thanks for sharing.

    I saw a bride wearing cobalt blue recently--bet she didn''t know she was much more traditional than she had likely thought!
     
  5. Hudson_Hawk
    Super_Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    10,541
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    by Hudson_Hawk » Feb 12, 2009
    This is so fascinating! FI and I are both 1/2 Brit, so we love learning more about the culture and history. My mom is a history buff, so I''ll be sure to pass this along to her!
     
  6. Definitely. Maybe
    Brilliant_Rock

    Messages:
    582
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    by Definitely. Maybe » Feb 12, 2009
    That is really interesting! Thanks for posting it!
     
  7. LaraOnline
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    3,365
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    by LaraOnline » Feb 12, 2009
    That was very interesting, thanks Melissa.
    I find it sad that so many modern Brits are currently antagonistic towards the state of marriage, it seems so .... negative and political. [​IMG]
     
  8. SailorsSweet<3
    Brilliant_Rock

    Messages:
    723
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    by SailorsSweet<3 » Feb 12, 2009
    Damn DeBeers for our LIWitis [​IMG] Very good article Winks I love reading about how what we today consider traditional is really far from it! I''m definitely not having a meat and mince pie at my wedding (although SO would not object to more meat [​IMG])
     
  9. Deelight
    Ideal_Rock

    Messages:
    5,544
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    by Deelight » Feb 12, 2009
    Interesting, I wonder how many women ended up with lacerated mouths from biting into the glass ring LOL.
     
  10. Winks_Elf
    Brilliant_Rock
    Trade

    Messages:
    1,567
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page