ella86
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 44
Well that makes sense. My problem with that is this:slg47|1327464698|3111129 said:Hi ella-I don't have a photo but measurements for fancy shapes can vary widely...so you can't really compare cushion vs princess. Look at the mm measurements on the grading reports.
ella86|1327465091|3111136 said:Well that makes sense. My problem with that is this:slg47|1327464698|3111129 said:Hi ella-I don't have a photo but measurements for fancy shapes can vary widely...so you can't really compare cushion vs princess. Look at the mm measurements on the grading reports.
I currently have a 1ct round (6.5mm), a friend of ours has a 1.5ct princess which ideally is also 6.5 mm. However, after doing research on here and comparing the stones, we have realized that the princess of the same mm looks significantly larger because of the larger table. So, that is what brought me to ask about cushions compared to princess cuts. I was just curious. Thanks though! Everyone is always so helpful here!![]()
jstarfireb|1327473143|3111174 said:Agreed, it's not the larger table, but you're onto something...despite the mm size being the same, the brain picks up on the extra face-up area that's in the corners and perceives it as larger. A princess will look even larger if you orient it with the corners pointing N/E/S/W (kite-set or star-set).
I agree! I have another friend who has a .5 princess that is kite set and it looks much larger than a .5!jstarfireb|1327473143|3111174 said:Agreed, it's not the larger table, but you're onto something...despite the mm size being the same, the brain picks up on the extra face-up area that's in the corners and perceives it as larger. A princess will look even larger if you orient it with the corners pointing N/E/S/W (kite-set or star-set).