FireGoddess
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2005
- Messages
- 12,145
Didn''t say anthing about size of stones, etc...
Camilla, er, I mean windowshopper...I like your ring better too!!!!!Date: 2/10/2005 10:15:51 PM
Author: windowshopper
you caught me........................
yes i am camilla![]()
You''re right - he shouldn''t have married Diana or any other woman when his heart belonged to Camilla. Both Princess Margaret and Prince Charles were not given permission to marry their true loves - and that''s pathetic! So instead, they settled for someone they loved less and look at the mess this has caused. I just hope that his children are allowed to follow their hearts.Date: 2/10/2005 10:167 PM![]()
Author: Mara
I like WindowShoppers'' better!![]()
In terms of the whole Charles/Camilla thing...personally I think it''s ridiculous he couldn''t marry her way back when...BUT because he couldn''t marry the woman he loved...he should not have turned around and married Diana. He could have stopped alot of drama and heartache....if he was not over Camilla (which obviously he wasn''t since he pined away for her, cheated with her, and now is marrying her)...he never should have gotten married to anyone else and brought them into the whole triangle.
For me it isn''t really about the adultery thing since eveyrone was getting involved back and forth, but rather about stopping the whole drama before it even started. Much more damage than just adultery seems like it has been done over the years.![]()
First of all, I''m sure throwing bread at the royal family would probably get you beheaded or something or I''m sure Prince Charles would have suffered from some ''scone throwing'' himself. Secondly, I''ve seen film of Camilla from years ago and she walked and looked the same then as she does now. My point is not so much Camilla bashing but pointing out how much Diana had to go through and how much scrutiny she was under for her every movement, everything she wore, everything she said or did and Camilla needs to clean up her act. NOBODY wants to see a Princess clomping around, hunched over, in high heels with clothed HANGING on her like they were on a clothes hanger. Also, she still had the same bitter, unsmiling horse face when she was younger that she still has today.That''s my opinion, this is not England, and I can say or feel whatever I wish about her.Date: 2/11/2005 4:249 AM![]()
Author: movie zombie
perhaps had charles married her 30 years ago [when she was young] the public wouldn''t feel it necessary to be so critical of 1-her looks [on which the royals will undoubtedly spend lots of $$$ just like they did on di] and 2-be so uncouth as to throw bread at her. why not bemoan charles'' lack of looks and his unmanly behavior in not marrying the woman he loved in the first place? why not throw bread at him?
i find it interesting that the public will attack her when in reality it was the royals to blame in the first place and charles for not doing the right thing at the time. i seem to recall that camilla was also in a car wreck some years back: could she possibly suffer from injuries and/or some physical disability for which she will now be subjected to ridicule? geez, whatever happened to ''do unto others as you would have them do unto you'' ?!
she is an older woman marrying an older man. reality is that we all get older. get used to it.....
its nice to see a happy ending to this story....that is, if the public will let them be happy. the ring is gorgeous and perhaps an indication that the royals have accepted her. they have nothing to lose now as charles will probably defer the crown to one of his sons anyway. the hope for the future is that the royals have learned their lesson. and let''s hope the public will have learned theirs.
i wish i could see all the jewels in their collection!!!!!!!!!!
peace, movie zombie
Date: 2/11/2005 3:22:29 AM
Author: Lord Summerisle
Aye, lest us not forget... Charles and Diana was not out of Charles choosing to marry her... it was arranged for him to marry her...
(and I''d still rather have the system we do... than have some slimy president whoes brownnosed and backstabbed his way to the top... at least here hes still not *supreme* ruler... he still has to offically deffer to her.
Remember Royalty is for life, not just for a political term.![]()
Date: 2/11/2005 3:42:35 AM
Author: BLINGQUEEN
I just heard on CNN that she was pelted by bread in the grocery store in England. I''m sorry, but that just cracks me up.
Date: 2/11/2005 3:22:29 AM
Author: Lord Summerisle
Aye, lest us not forget... Charles and Diana was not out of Charles choosing to marry her... it was arranged for him to marry her...
(and I''d still rather have the system we do... than have some slimy president whoes brownnosed and backstabbed his way to the top... at least here hes still not *supreme* ruler... he still has to offically deffer to her.
Remember Royalty is for life, not just for a political term.![]()