An arrow-less 60/60?

[FB.]

Do the following proportions create a virtually-arrow-less diamond of the bright-but-less-fiery, 60/60 flavour, without the "ring of death" of a deep pavilion?

I can''t envisage a problem, but subtleties of diamond proportions can be a minefield and I''d appreciate an expert''s opinion.

Table 60%
Crown angle: 33.5''
Crown height: 13.0%
Star: 60%
Girdle: slightly thick
Pavilion angle: 41.4''
Pavilion depth: 43.5%
Lower half: 80%
Total depth: 60.8%

Thanks,

 

[tonyc2387]

FB, why do I get the impression that if someone gave you a license to DiamCalc, you would just flat disappear for a few weeks?

that being said, interesting question. but isn''t it possible to get an arrow-less well proportioned, but relatively unsymmetrical cut?

 

[ChunkyCushionLover]

Date: 12/4/2009 12:24:07 AM
Author: tonyc2387
FB, why do I get the impression that if someone gave you a license to DiamCalc, you would just flat disappear for a few weeks?

that being said, interesting question. but isn''t it possible to get an arrow-less well proportioned, but relatively unsymmetrical cut?

Yeah give the man Diamcalc way too many assumptions being made without visual proof.

 

[Karl_K]

with no variations.
Real world there will be variations and likely some leakage.
Remember in DC diamonds are perfect which they never are in the real world.
btw 60% stars is a no-no in this combo.
50% is much better.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 12/4/2009 3:10:03 AM
Author: Karl_K
with no variations.
Real world there will be variations and likely some leakage.
Remember in DC diamonds are perfect which they never are in the real world.
btw 60% stars is a no-no in this combo.
50% is much better.

Ditto