Though not sure...I don''t think that''s right. I think you stick with the worst score, in principle. That is...two 2s make for a 2...not a 4 after you add them together...whether or not that applies to this particular stone.Date: 7/30/2007 12:15:34 AM
Author: WorkingHardforSmallRewards
so 2 on polish and symmetry should make it an AGS4 based on their numerical grading system, though that does seem like a ridiculously steep penalty, especially when compared to GIA excellent cut grades accepting VGs in their top tier.
hum, since I have some time, im going to go run some searches and maybe I can find some examples, blue nile here I come!Date: 7/30/2007 12:29:25 AM
Author: Regular Guy
Though not sure...I don''t think that''s right. I think you stick with the worst score, in principle. That is...two 2s make for a 2...not a 4 after you add them together...whether or not that applies to this particular stone.Date: 7/30/2007 12:15:34 AM
Author: WorkingHardforSmallRewards
so 2 on polish and symmetry should make it an AGS4 based on their numerical grading system, though that does seem like a ridiculously steep penalty, especially when compared to GIA excellent cut grades accepting VGs in their top tier.
Date: 7/30/2007 12:15:34 AM
Author: WorkingHardforSmallRewards
In summary, its like golf. low scores win
VG equals 2 over, if you are two strokes back on the 6th and 7th hole, even if you are par on everything else you will, obviously, be 4 over overall.
so 2 on polish and symmetry should make it an AGS4 based on their numerical grading system, though that does seem like a ridiculously steep penalty, especially when compared to GIA excellent cut grades accepting VGs in their top tier.
Thanks John.Date: 7/30/2007 12:31:22 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
The cut grade has three factors, the lowest of which determines the final grade.
Light Performance is a cumulative grade (added up). It''s the sum of all deductions for Brightness, Contrast, Dispersion & Leakage. If the total deductions are < 0.50 the LP grade is 0. If 0.50-1.49 the LP grade is 1. If 1.50-2.49 the LP grade is 2 and so on.
Proportion Factors is part cumulative (girdle thickness, culet size) and part net-lowering (durability, weight ratio, tilt). If the girdle and culet both have deductions of 1 the PF grade is 2. If there are no cum deductions but weight ratio and tilt both have deductions of 1 the PF grade is 1 (b/c those are net-lowering deductions). If there are no deductions the PF grade is 0.
Finish (polish & symmetry) are net-lowering. Polish can be 0 and symmetry can be 2, which would result in a finish grade of 2. Polish and symmetry can both be 2, which would also result in a 2. If the polish grade is 5 and the symmetry grade is 0 the finish grade is a 5.
The cut grade is the lowest grade (net) between LP, PF and Finish.
Light Performance 0
Proportion Factors 0
Finish 1
Cut grade = AGS1
Light Performance 3
Proportion Factors 0
Finish 0
Cut grade = AGS3
Keeping it ''real'' for the original poster... AGSL is extremely hard on finish, which many elite craftsmen applaud. For the consumer; if you find a diamond that scored 0 in light performance and proportion factors - and the polish/sym is EX or VG (making it AGS1 or AGS2) those differences won''t be visible to the naked eye. Such a diamond can be a nice deal if discounted because of this.