Advice, Please!

[Dan8]

First off, thanks to everyone for the great information provided on this forum. It has been very helpful.

I am long time lurker looking to make a purchase soon. I know that these two are VERY similar, but can anyone suggest any reasons to pick one over the other?
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-636622.htm
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-737788.htm

I have been told both are ‘eye-clean’. Are there any reasons to be concerned about the inclusions shown on the idealscope images?

Thanks again.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 11/22/2008 10:07:19 AM
Author:Dan8

First off, thanks to everyone for the great information provided on this forum. It has been very helpful.

I am long time lurker looking to make a purchase soon. I know that these two are VERY similar, but can anyone suggest any reasons to pick one over the other?
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-636622.htm
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-737788.htm






I have been told both are ‘eye-clean’. Are there any reasons to be concerned about the inclusions shown on the idealscope images?

Thanks again.

Welcome to Pricescope Dan,

Make sure you let WF know your definition of an eyeclean diamond, if you don't want to see any inclusions at all from close scrutiny for example, then let them know that. If you have already done so then thats fine and also any inclusions seen on the images are highly magnified and not what you will see in reality.

If you are stuck on which to choose, then ask your WF rep to evaluate both diamonds for you so that you get a better idea of which one might be the best one to go for.

 

[gwendolyn]

The second one looks cleaner to me, but it may not make a difference considering how much those images are blown up. Did you ask the WF rep you're dealing with what his/her exact definition of 'eye clean' is?

ETA: Whoops, not fast enough!

 

[Ellen]

Date: 11/22/2008 10:15:17 AM
Author: gwendolyn
The second one looks cleaner to me, but it may not make a difference considering how much those images are blown up. Did you ask the WF rep you''re dealing with what his/her exact definition of ''eye clean'' is?

ETA: Whoops, not fast enough!

The gal''s like lightening, ain''t she??

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 11/22/2008 12:00:54 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 11/22/2008 10:15:17 AM
Author: gwendolyn
The second one looks cleaner to me, but it may not make a difference considering how much those images are blown up. Did you ask the WF rep you''re dealing with what his/her exact definition of ''eye clean'' is?

ETA: Whoops, not fast enough!

The gal''s like lightening, ain''t she??

 

[gwendolyn]

Date: 11/22/2008 12:00:54 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 11/22/2008 10:15:17 AM

Author: gwendolyn

The second one looks cleaner to me, but it may not make a difference considering how much those images are blown up. Did you ask the WF rep you''re dealing with what his/her exact definition of ''eye clean'' is?


ETA: Whoops, not fast enough!

The gal''s like lightening, ain''t she??

She is!! I felt her *WHOOSH* as I was leaving the thread!

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 11/22/2008 12:27:54 PM
Author: gwendolyn

Date: 11/22/2008 12:00:54 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 11/22/2008 10:15:17 AM

Author: gwendolyn

The second one looks cleaner to me, but it may not make a difference considering how much those images are blown up. Did you ask the WF rep you''re dealing with what his/her exact definition of ''eye clean'' is?


ETA: Whoops, not fast enough!

The gal''s like lightening, ain''t she??

She is!! I felt her *WHOOSH* as I was leaving the thread!

 

[gwendolyn]

LOL!

"My hero!"

 

[neatfreak]

Agreed about the eyeclean clarification, but if the WF rep says both are, you could toss a coin...