A Princess Cut 1.06 ct with a depth of 70.5% and Table of 77%

[manohman]

Is this a good diamond?

 

[small_paws]

I am nowhere near expert but I''m in the market for a princess and have always heard the table % should be less than total depth %

I believe someone here posted that they recommend table from 62% - 70% and depth 70% - 75%. Someone please correct me if I''m wrong.

 

[jet2ks]

Probably not. Numbers don''t tell the whole story with princess and other fancy shapes, but that combination has a very low chance of producing a nice stone.

 

[stone-cold11]

ditto.

 

[manohman]

These are the total specs on the diamond. Would this make it a better diamond?


Shape: Princess
Carat weight: 1.06
Cut: Excellent
Color: F
Clarity: VVS1
Certificate: GIA

Depth: 70.50%
Table: 77%
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Excellent
Girdle: Slightly Thick - Thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Measurements: 5.74*5.69*4.01

 

[jet2ks]

No

 

[manohman]

What do you think needs to be changed to be changed to make it a better stone?

 

[stone-cold11]

Rough guidelines

https://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/diamond-grading-chart-princess/

And the get an ASET image.

http://www.highperformancediamonds.com/index.php?page=education-performance

 

[manohman]

Thanks for your help Stone-cold11