So I went to Tiffany''s flagship store in NYC a number of times. There was a person in the elevator to take you to your floor (even though its a normal button elevator rather than a manual one from the early 1900s). When you get to the engagement floor, they offer you complementary champagne or bottled water. And the SAs there are nothing if not professional and courteous. When asked about the quality of their stones, they assured me that it is held to a "higher standard" than that of either GIA or AGS. It really is a different type of engagement ring shopping experience.
However, that''s where the clock struck 12 and my coach turned into a pumpkin. When I asked for the cert for a few diamonds, I learned that they do not submit their diamonds to an outside independent firm like GIA/AGS but do it in-house. Call me skeptical, but isn''t that a bit of a conflict of interest? The guy who is selling me the stone is also rating them? Ok, but it''s Tiffany so I can trust them to sell only the best quality.
So then I get the certs and to my surprise, none of them have any inclusion plots! So I just have to take their word that it is a VS2 or VVS1 or whatever! Not to say I don''t trust them, but at the same time we all know that there are VS2s (eh...) and then there are VS2s (wow!). Of course, outside of a color lamp and a loop, they don''t provide any other evaluation tools (e.g., ideal scope, magnified image, etc). But not a big deal since many places don''t do this.
Now for the big surprise. I took the diamond specs and ran two of them through HCA. Their scores came back 4.2 and 4.5!! Here are the specs for a RB that I kept the cert for:
Depth: 62.6%
Table: 57
Crown Ang: 35.3%
Pav Ang: 41.2%
I am not making this up. I was shocked. If I''m going to pay a 70-100% premium for a Tiffany ring, I understand that I''m paying for the brand. But at least I thought I would be getting an amazing stone! To me, these things were lemons. I am not trying to malign Tiffany and to be fair, I only ran the HCA on two of the stones. But still, huge price premium, stones are rated by the seller using standards seller claims to be strict, no inclusion plots, and poor performing stones. Am I missing something?
However, that''s where the clock struck 12 and my coach turned into a pumpkin. When I asked for the cert for a few diamonds, I learned that they do not submit their diamonds to an outside independent firm like GIA/AGS but do it in-house. Call me skeptical, but isn''t that a bit of a conflict of interest? The guy who is selling me the stone is also rating them? Ok, but it''s Tiffany so I can trust them to sell only the best quality.
So then I get the certs and to my surprise, none of them have any inclusion plots! So I just have to take their word that it is a VS2 or VVS1 or whatever! Not to say I don''t trust them, but at the same time we all know that there are VS2s (eh...) and then there are VS2s (wow!). Of course, outside of a color lamp and a loop, they don''t provide any other evaluation tools (e.g., ideal scope, magnified image, etc). But not a big deal since many places don''t do this.
Now for the big surprise. I took the diamond specs and ran two of them through HCA. Their scores came back 4.2 and 4.5!! Here are the specs for a RB that I kept the cert for:
Depth: 62.6%
Table: 57
Crown Ang: 35.3%
Pav Ang: 41.2%
I am not making this up. I was shocked. If I''m going to pay a 70-100% premium for a Tiffany ring, I understand that I''m paying for the brand. But at least I thought I would be getting an amazing stone! To me, these things were lemons. I am not trying to malign Tiffany and to be fair, I only ran the HCA on two of the stones. But still, huge price premium, stones are rated by the seller using standards seller claims to be strict, no inclusion plots, and poor performing stones. Am I missing something?