- Joined
- Mar 9, 2009
- Messages
- 419
Another question, as I keep browsing through diamonds:
I know that when it comes to cushions a table in the mid-upper 50''s is great with a depth in the mid 60''s for great light performance (correct me if I''m wrong), but it seems like a lot of cushions I am finding have very similar depths and tables--
for example, depth- 61.8, table 60. or depth 63, table 64... the numbers themselves aren''t what i am dwelling on- i made them up, just wondering about having them be so similar.
is having the depth and table as such similar numbers a bad thing?
I know that when it comes to cushions a table in the mid-upper 50''s is great with a depth in the mid 60''s for great light performance (correct me if I''m wrong), but it seems like a lot of cushions I am finding have very similar depths and tables--
for example, depth- 61.8, table 60. or depth 63, table 64... the numbers themselves aren''t what i am dwelling on- i made them up, just wondering about having them be so similar.
is having the depth and table as such similar numbers a bad thing?