shape
carat
color
clarity

4tcw 3stone OR 2.7ct solitaire - Which would you choose?

384123

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 7, 2020
Messages
17
Hello!

I have the option of upgrading my 2.25ct round to a 3 stone with ~1ct round side stones-- Totalling ~4ctw.

OR I can upgrade the stone to a 2.7ct round solitaire.

What would you do?

image_6483441.JPG
 

missy

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
53,980
This might seem obvious but which look do you prefer? Which would you enjoy wearing more?
 

diamondseeker2006

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
58,547
That's a very hard question. I have a diamond about the same size and I strongly considered a three stone, but I would have used smaller side diamonds than that since I think large sides make the center look smaller. I liked cflutist's ring that has a 8.4mm center and 5.2 mm (each) sides.

cflutist8.4mm.5.2mm.jpg

Ultimately I decided to change to a halo! But I think if I had a stone that could be upgraded, I would be very tempted to go for the 2.7 which will be a significant size increase. I like both ideas, though.
 

dkata

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
1,024
I would choose a solitaire, but I may be biased, because I have one at about am the same carat.
 

Austina

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
7,555
I think you need to decide which will suit your lifestyle the best, they’re both lovely, but only you can choose what‘ll work best for you.
 

nala

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
7,045
So your main stone would go to a 2.50 and 1 carat in sides? For sure!
 

tyty333

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
27,198
Are you tired of the solitaire look?

I think she is saying approximately @nala which I take to mean 3.75 (center stays the same)...but ???
 

Spring Day

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
938
Ok so I would usually say 3 stone but man if both of those options look great in you! I can’t believe I’m saying this but I actually love the solitaire on you a little better. With your small finger size you’re still getting great finger coverage and it’s a classic choice that will never go out of style.
 

AprilBaby

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
13,234
I upgraded from a 3 stone to a solitaire and now I want to add side stones to my solitaire because I miss my three stone.
 

lulu_ma

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
4,084
I am really into 3 stones right now, but I would go for the 2.7.
 

AprilBaby

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
13,234
Get the 2.7 and make it into a three stone!
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2021
Messages
141
I would go for the 3-stone but I personally like the look of ice across the whole finger, with a proportionally small wedding band like what you have pictured. Or, upgrade to the bigger one now and make it a 3-stone later! ;)2
 

arabellan

Rough_Rock
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
36
3 stone!
 

Piper70

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Nov 19, 2019
Messages
489
3 stone! I have “man hands” so I would always go for more finger coverage.
 

RunningwithScissors

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
3,699
That would be an incredibly difficult decision. They both look great, but they are both such different looks. I honestly don't know what I'd do. Sorry I'm not any help!
 

Diamond Girl 21

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 26, 2017
Messages
2,206
You really can't go wrong. Both options are gorgeous.
 

Yimmers

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
1,144
Honestly, I am a solitaire girl myself. However, that's me. You do what you want to do!!! I'd experiment with a costume jewelry 3-stone ring to see if you like that look.
 

mrs-b

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
11,542
Both gorgeous. No help, right?

:wavey:
 

Monnyjay

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
1,572
I’m not much help either. A 2.60 to 2.80ct is in my wish list in a traditional Tiffany setting but I also love the idea of a 3 stone as @diamondseeker2006 mentioned with smaller side stones so the centre is standout. Can’t wait to see what you choose.
 

lugger

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 17, 2020
Messages
46
Hello!

I have the option of upgrading my 2.25ct round to a 3 stone with ~1ct round side stones-- Totalling ~4ctw.

OR I can upgrade the stone to a 2.7ct round solitaire.

What would you do?

image_6483441.JPG

i know many will not agree with me but side stones are like window dressing to me. Id go for the solitaire.
 

Dmndsr4evr11

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Messages
1,490
I’m a solitaire person but that 3 stone looks great too and I’ve seen many gorgeous three stones here. Tough decision.
 

eh613c

Shiny_Rock
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
450
@384123 It depends what you’re trying to accomplish. If you want a bigger stone, then go for the 2.7. If you’re going after finger coverage then the 3 stone. Both are gorgeous. Another idea is to get the 2.7 for now and make it into a 3 stone at another milestone anniversary.
 

DiamondGal28

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
91
What an incredible position to be in! So happy for you, as both options are amazing. Not sure what your preferences are but, I've found DSS is easier to fight off with a 3 stone ring vs. a solitaire. Either way you can't go wrong. Can't wait to see final pictures.
 

Gemly

Shiny_Rock
Joined
May 29, 2020
Messages
293
Hello!

I have the option of upgrading my 2.25ct round to a 3 stone with ~1ct round side stones-- Totalling ~4ctw.

OR I can upgrade the stone to a 2.7ct round solitaire.

What would you do?

image_6483441.JPG

Usually I’d always go for the solitaire...but in this case I love that 3 stone on your hand!
 

Crazie4Cuts

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 9, 2014
Messages
551
Vote for 3 stone! Hopefully, sometime in the near future I’ll be on that same path! I want the coverage and look!

-C4C
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top