shape
carat
color
clarity

2 stones to choose from NEED HELP PLEASE ?!?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

franklin11

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
13
Hello Everyone,

I have a choice to make here for a stone that needs to have as close to a 6.5mm diameter as possible (I believe that means it has to be at least a 1ct stone?) to fit properly into an Alex Sepkus ring (model: R-80M in platnium) that I am pretty darn positive I have chosen to go with for the big question day!

I have attached the pdf files of the diamonds, I recently looked at, that my local Jeweler supplied to me to continue my decision making process.

I was steering(ed) to the 1.11 H ($7250)....the viewing under 10x was showing a slightest of slight feather/spec in the table and the small amount of cloud around one part of the perimeter.

The 1.03 G was clear clear, but was $7920....

I kinda wanted to go with the 1.11 since it did have the larger diameter... Why??? ...

Since this particular ring/setting is a full bezel, the smaller end of the diameter spectrum that the diamond I choose has.... the thicker the bezel around the diamond would be...

Therefore with the larger diameter stone (that has inclusions that are fine with me and with the H color, also looked fine to me next to the other G color stone) ... the overall thickness of the metal bezel would become thinner and thus more focus on the stone...

Does any of this babble make sense? Ok, so if anyone can help me out with reading the reports, angles, proportions and if the prices are in line...please let me know...I have to make a decision pretty quick here and any help would be appriciated
41.gif


Also, if there are any experts out there that can show me similar stones with what I am in need of that are a better overall bargain that would be super too!

Cheers,
Erik
 

Attachments

Can you get an idealscope image? The 1.11c is at the border of steep/deep, might have some leakage or not depending on the averaging and rounding of the numbers by GIA. Leakage is bad for a bezel mount as it will make the stone look dark.
 
Should I ask the jeweler to provide an idealscope report? Nothing was said to me about it by them?
 
Most jewelers do not have these scope.

Ask if they have the scope and if you can use it or buy one yourself, relatively cheap at $25 for the basic idealscope. http://ideal-scope.com/cart_order.asp
 
Date: 1/23/2010 9:30:47 AM
Author: Stone-cold11
Can you get an idealscope image? The 1.11c is at the border of steep/deep, might have some leakage or not depending on the averaging and rounding of the numbers by GIA. Leakage is bad for a bezel mount as it will make the stone look dark.
Stonecold is right, an Idealscope image would be very helpful either from the seller, or if you purchase a scope you can check for yourself for light leakage. As stonecold explains, this stone is borderline steep deep and it does depend on the averages of the angles, forced rounding as per GIA cut grading and overall precision of the cut can make or break this angle combo for light leakage.
 
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/Whiteflash-ACA-cut-diamond-2212170.htm#

Thanks again for all the insight!

I found this one doing a pricescope search. How does it compare to the 1.11 we have been speaking of?

Thanks again in advance for all your help..this is more stressfull than I originally thought

cheers!
 
Date: 1/24/2010 9:58:06 PM
Author: franklin11
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/Whiteflash-ACA-cut-diamond-2212170.htm#

Thanks again for all the insight!

I found this one doing a pricescope search. How does it compare to the 1.11 we have been speaking of?

Thanks again in advance for all your help..this is more stressfull than I originally thought

cheers!
This is a safer bet because its angles are more desirable and it already comes with an IS image and other cut evalutation tools. It is a gorgeous diamond. Also WF has a lifetime upgrade and buyback policy that you may or may not get from your jeweler. Not to mention it is almost $1k less expensive
4.gif
 
The WF diamond would be gorgeous.
 
I am just wondering about the WF diamond. It does not show the inclusions on the report and says something about clouds not shown? I am a bit concerned due to the fact it is SI1? thanks again in advance for your help everyone.

Erik
 
Date: 1/26/2010 10:24:02 PM
Author: dreamer_dachsie
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/Whiteflash-ACA-cut-diamond-2212170.htm#

Do you mean this one? The inclusions are on the cert (click AGS), they are pretty miniscule and the grade makers are a needle, a crystal and a feather. No worries. Most certs say ''additional clouds not shown''. Only when it says, ''Clarity grade based on additonal clouds not shown'' should you worry.
Very nice pick!! WF will give you their honest opinion about the inclusions. Call and speak to a sales associate about it.
 
Hey there, thanks for your reply...it does say this on the report

Key to Symbols
CLARITY PLOT INFORMATION: Red marks indicate inclusions; green marks
indicate external blemishes.
"ƒ" and "AGS-1040375400022"
have been inscribed on the girdle of this diamond.
The clarity grade of this diamond is based on clouds
that are not shown.
Fluorescence: Negligible


is this what you were saying to steer clear of ?

Erik
 
Yes, I didn''t see that. It does not necessarily mean to avoid it all together, it does mean that you need to have a qualified gemologist examine the diamond to determine whether or not the clouds are large enough to affect the light performance of the diamond. WF can comment on this issue for you. But I might consider other options instead.

I like this one, bigger and cleaner, still less than the original:

http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/Whiteflash-ACA-cut-diamond-2219629.htm#
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top