2 Rocks: Help Me Decide!!!

[joelovesfishin]

1.067
G/VS2
6.64-6.65 x 4.04 mm
Depth: 60.7
Table: 54%
Girdle: 0.8-1.4
Crown Angle: 34.600
Pavilion Angle: 40.700
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Fluorescence: N

Here''s the Photo''s: Diamond 1

1.083
G/VS2
6.57-6.59 x 4.09 mm
Depth: 62.2%
Table: 55%
Girdle: 0.8-2.3
Crown Angle: 34.600
Pavilion Angle: 40.800
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Fluorescence: N
Here''s the Photo''s: Diamond 2

Thanks for any help!!!

 

[Maxine]

I like the first one....it has less carat weight, but it actually has a larger diameter (because it is not as deep as the second one).....
Just my unprofessional opinion, of course!!

 

[JohnQuixote]

Nice selections.

The depth of #2 is a bit out of my own tight tolerance boundries, but both diamonds will be dynamic performers looking at the ideal-scopes. #1 will have a fluid and colorful character to its scintillation while #2 will be a bit more snappy. The table on #1 will also amplify the DCLR (chromatic flares/prismatic color). If you are hair-splitting the level of H&A exactness, #1 has more precise patterning - but that won't make any visible difference in the two.

For me, sight-unseen, #1 wins by a nose.

 

[Dancing Fire]

this is easy,i''ll take #1.... not as deep,the harts are more precise.

 

[joelovesfishin]

Thanks for your help...Diamond 1 was what I was thinking, I wanted to make sure there wasn''t something you experts might have seen...Once again THANKS!!

Joe

 

[fire&ice]

Number 1 - assuming the prices are in the same range.