2 choices

[lowjim]

No.1 - bigger and a bit more expensive but negligible fluorescence.
http://www.bluenile.co.uk/diamonds_details.asp?__fun_frm=i&pid=LD01011872&filter_id=0

No.2
http://www.bluenile.co.uk/diamonds_details.asp?__fun_frm=i&pid=LD01001659&filter_id=0

am i missing anything in the proportions of these or are they both well cut stones?
thanks in advance,
Jim.

 

[JulieN]

1.19

 

[lowjim]

better value for money? Do you reckon the cut is better?
thanks.

 

[JulieN]

cut looks better, marginally.

 

[lowjim]

might have another look around just incase but if not i may buy it today. Do you think it''s good value?
thanks,
Jim.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 5/25/2007 5:09:34 AM
Author: lowjim
might have another look around just incase but if not i may buy it today. Do you think it''s good value?
thanks,
Jim.

The 1.19 looks great!

One thing you may not know, is GIA rounds their numbers, so what the exact angles are on a diamond, you can''t know without a Sarin report or other. Since BN doesn''t give info like that, your safest bet with them is to stick with an AGS000. That will ensure you get a decent diamond!

Also, just a heads up, if you think the need to upgrade may ever arise, BN doesn''t offer that option.