The colour of the stones was very hard to estimate, since the rough seemed to have a lot of colour in the surface. Talking to other cutters, we learned that this is normal with rough from Botswana. However, we tried to estimate the exact colour of the stones. If we would give a D colour the value of 1, E the value of 2, and so on, up to J the value of 7, we estimated an average colour of this parcel of 4.58, or an average of G-H in colour.
These stones also contained a lot of naat, and inclusions, which were difficult to judge, and we estimated the average clarity of the parcel as SI1. Figure-wise, with IF being 1, VVS1 being 2, and so on, we thus estimated this parcel at an average clarity of 6.
Quickly estimating the weight of each finished stone gave us a final estimated weight of 47.90 Carats, thus a yield of 34.65% from the rough.
The decision was quickly made: we had to buy this parcel.
In weight, we ended up with a total finished weight of 48.94 Carats, thus a yield of 35.40% , which was a tad higher than the expected 34.65%.
In colour, we estimated the final colour (in our figure-system) at 4.53. We had estimated a colour of 4.58. Roughly, we could say that we ended up exactly with the average G-H-colour, which we had predicted.
In clarity, we had predicted a clarity of 6, which stood for SI1 in our system. After cutting, we estimated the final clarity at 6.21, thus a little lower than SI1.
All in all, we were very happy with the outcome, although the slightly lower clarity already lowered the $-outcome of our parcel by 6%. Still, we did consider this a good buy, especially since we are very comfortable with our estimates before sending to AGS, and we generally get the same results on our grading reports.
In colour, in stead of the predicted colour of 4.53, we received an average grade of 5.12, thus an average of H in stead of G-H. Generally, we have the experience that AGS gives a slightly better colour-grade than our estimate, and this difference is very surprising to us.
In clarity, we predicted a clarity of 6.21, and AGS graded the parcel at an average grade of 6.58. Normally, we are used to AGS grading clarity slightly stricter than our prediction, thus this does not surprise us at all.
However, where we generally get a somewhat stricter grade on clarity, and a slightly better grade on colour, we now got a stricter grade on both.
When looking at this dollar-wise, the picture becomes problematic. Before sending the stones to AGS, we estimated our return to be 94% of our original prediction. With the resulting AGS-grades, our return now is only 83% of our original prediction.
We had estimated to turn a profit of 15% on this parcel. Now, it turns out to be a loss of 5%.
Now, this is not something to mourn too much about, since sometimes estimates can be incorrect in the other direction too, and this would lead to unexpected profits.
And, the good thing is, that we now do have a number of very interesting stones available, in highly desirable colours and clarities, and these should be very easy to sell.