Haven
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Messages
- 13,166
You may be right that people wouldn't have behaved differently in any other era had they had access to bigger mortgages and larger credit lines. (In fact, although there's no way to know this, I absolutely agree with you that they probably would have done the exact same thing.) However, the fact that people currently have access to those things is a function of modern society. When we talk about what's wrong with society these days, we aren't just talking about individuals. The question is: Is there something wrong with a society that has systems which allow people to take out mortgages and credit lines that they just plain can't afford?suchende|1296695595|2841388 said:Yes, they were. They were able to do so only recently because bankers were growing a market for securitized debt, making more and bigger mortgages available to more people. I don't think people would have behaved any differently in any other era, so I don't think it's an indicator of something being wrong with our society in general, or wrong with our society "these days."
I actually don't know what I think about this, because I do feel that people are responsible for their own actions, yet it does seem "wrong" for lenders to knowingly put people into horrible financial positions by extending credit they just won't be able to handle.
No--I still don't think that personal responsibility goes out the window once people are given the opportunity to make poor decisions. Alcohol is readily available to most individuals, yet every individual doesn't go out and drive drunk, and when people do, they're held responsible for it. Nobody says "That clerk shouldn't have sold her that vodka." People need to be smart and take care of themselves and take responsibility for their own lives and lifestyles.
It's funny because there was a recent thread about pop culture in America and how certain unsavory things are EVERYWHERE! (Reality TV stars, girls in short skirts, those type of things.) My reaction was: No they're not. I don't see those things. I don't know who any of these reality stars are that people talk about on PS. There seems to be a similar idea that people are DRIVEN to consumerism by the evil media and their peers, and FORCED TO BELIEVE they must have that expensive handbag if they are to be fulfilled in life. Really? I don't see those things. I watch some television, and I read a lot of newspapers and magazines, and I listen to the radio, but the choices I make about which shows and programs and publications to view and listen to don't include anything that glamorizes spending money and keeping up with the Kardashians. (See--I know one reference. Wasn't he a football player? I do know sports.) I don't feel bad for someone who can barely get by financially yet exposes herself to all sorts of programs (and people) that glamorize consumerism, which then drives her to purchase crap she can't afford. Stop watching the television! Change the channel. Get off the diamond forum! If you really can't control your spending, don't surround yourself with temptations that will make it hurt so good.
I guess I really don't understand it. I do understand that some people are losing their homes due to horrible circumstances beyond their control, but I don't believe they are the majority. And I don't feel bad for the foreclosed who face the horrible prospect of finding affordable housing with storage enough for their Coach handbags and 47 pairs of heels.
ETA:
KSinger--I hope that whatever is happening to your hand today goes well.