eks6426
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,011
Date: 2/3/2006 3:50:37 AM
Author: Lorelei
Am I comitting a huge fashion crime by wearing little white socks with loafers????? My Hubby says I am![]()
Pants!Date: 2/3/2006 4:04:45 AM
Author: sunkist
Date: 2/3/2006 3:50:37 AM
Author: Lorelei
Am I comitting a huge fashion crime by wearing little white socks with loafers????? My Hubby says I am![]()
Well now that depends, is it with a dress or pants?!heehee!![]()
![]()
You found me out Moresie! ROFLMAO - you are so BAD!!!!Date: 2/3/2006 10:12:43 AM
Author: moremoremore
LOL...who are you? Michael Jackson?![]()
No white socks with loafers no white socks with loafers! I KNEW my confession would horrify you MaraDate: 2/3/2006 1:03:25 PM
Author: Mara
OMG Lorelei, NO tiny white socks with loafers!!!! Repeat after me...no white socks with loafers, no white socks with loafers!
I feel like a total fashion victim when I go to my workout class wearing thicker white socks (Gregs) when I can''t find my small thin white girly ones. Even cuter is when they are worn with capri workout pants.![]()
Date: 2/13/2006 2:21:37 AM
Author: monarch64
LOL, C! I live outside of Chicago, and believe me, I wouldn''t set foot outside without my legs covered! I can remember living in southern IN and going to my high school prom when I had a friend who didn''t wear hose under her dress--I thought she was so tacky!!! I hate wearing hose, but sometimes they are just appropriate. I went through absolute hell trying to find the right ones to wear under my wedding gown. I''m just a very old school 20-something, I guess. I ended up buying umpteem pairs of Spanx, and every other brand of toeless/footless hose I could find without returning any of them for the butt jiggle factor alone. I finally ended up wearing a pair of regular nude hose (my dress was a little on the sheer side and form fitting so I didn''t want the waist band to be visible) and cutting off the feet--how ''ghetto'' is that?!
I just hate seeing visible thongs, or anything that is recognizable as an undergarment on ladies. I feel like it takes away the feminine mystery, so to speak! And I''m just a fan of being modest while showing off one''s figure, legs included! For me, it''s all about accentuating the positives while ''hiding'' the flaws!
![]()
Date: 2/13/2006 2:21:37 AM
Author: monarch64
LOL, C! I live outside of Chicago, and believe me, I wouldn''t set foot outside without my legs covered! I can remember living in southern IN and going to my high school prom when I had a friend who didn''t wear hose under her dress--I thought she was so tacky!!! I hate wearing hose, but sometimes they are just appropriate. I went through absolute hell trying to find the right ones to wear under my wedding gown. I''m just a very old school 20-something, I guess. I ended up buying umpteem pairs of Spanx, and every other brand of toeless/footless hose I could find without returning any of them for the butt jiggle factor alone. I finally ended up wearing a pair of regular nude hose (my dress was a little on the sheer side and form fitting so I didn''t want the waist band to be visible) and cutting off the feet--how ''ghetto'' is that?!
I just hate seeing visible thongs, or anything that is recognizable as an undergarment on ladies. I feel like it takes away the feminine mystery, so to speak! And I''m just a fan of being modest while showing off one''s figure, legs included! For me, it''s all about accentuating the positives while ''hiding'' the flaws!
![]()
what creeps ME out the most is the picture of the extra large foot!Date: 3/2/2006 3:55:05 PM
Author: Starset Princess
those to-hos are kinda creepy - it''s still the pantyhose over painted toenails but since the separation is not expected it creeps me out![]()
pantyhose over painted toenails is just wrong.Date: 3/2/2006 6:27:30 PM
Author: Mara
what creeps ME out the most is the picture of the extra large foot!Date: 3/2/2006 3:55:05 PM
Author: Starset Princess
those to-hos are kinda creepy - it''s still the pantyhose over painted toenails but since the separation is not expected it creeps me out![]()
![]()