E B
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2005
- Messages
- 9,491
Indeed; I read their takes on it as well.
But herein lies a PERFECT example of this ongoing debate laced with biased viewpoints on perceived political 'misconduct'. You can't point at the Clinton/uranium concerns and say 'nope, no proof, she's innocent, look over here at Trump & Russians, etc' while simulanteuously hanging a noose from the tree with Trump's name on it for something he is perceived (ONLY by the media and liberals) to have done.
I didn't say this, nor did the fact-checking articles. And if you did read any of the articles, you'll see what an apples-to-seeds comparison the two are. That said, if there's reason to investigate Hillary for wrongdoing, I'm sure it'll happen. She's been through it and back about a hundred times. The links at this point seem awfully tenuous, however. For Trump, a little more so, not to mention he's the current president. And by the way, this isn't just some lib fantasy, it is a multi-IC investigation that has been going on long before he was elected, was just described by Burr as the largest Hill investigation he's ever seen, and was just reported by both the NYT and ranking member of the HIC as having "more than circumstantial" evidence of collusion. A whole lotta bipartisan participation for a lib witch hunt, me thinks.
I do want to point out, and then I'll let you have the last word, that during the election process you were just as guilty of the noose-tying behavior you're scolding others for, here. And to a certain extent, there's nothing wrong with it. Our first amendment rights, and all. Your candidate (and I know what you'll say here, but your vote = your candidate) holding the presidency has given you a unique platform on which to rest in this regard, but I hope this is something you DO realize, whether you acknowledge it or not.
Last edited: