- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 5,096
You are right..., the odds are against (big time)..., but could you imagine?Date: 6/14/2009 4:56:37 AM
Author: Gypsy
I wish. But I doubt it. The religious leader of the country has certified the results, giving their blessing to the fixed election. If the population rebells they will be facing the entire religious and political force of the country against them. And this is a country that is just limping toward recovery after decades of bloody war that decimated their population, especially their male population in their 20''s and 30''s. So your talking about a lot of women rebelling against the physical and ideological might of a mysogonistic regime. It would either have to be a huge revolution. Or it would indeed be ''mini'' because anyone daring to participate would be immediately killed as an example and warning to others.
Six days since this post...Date: 6/14/2009 3:57:34 PM
Author: DiaGem
You are right..., the odds are against (big time)..., but could you imagine?Date: 6/14/2009 4:56:37 AM
Author: Gypsy
I wish. But I doubt it. The religious leader of the country has certified the results, giving their blessing to the fixed election. If the population rebells they will be facing the entire religious and political force of the country against them. And this is a country that is just limping toward recovery after decades of bloody war that decimated their population, especially their male population in their 20''s and 30''s. So your talking about a lot of women rebelling against the physical and ideological might of a mysogonistic regime. It would either have to be a huge revolution. Or it would indeed be ''mini'' because anyone daring to participate would be immediately killed as an example and warning to others.
Yes. I can now. It's so painful to be hoping for something to happen which causes so much pain to so many (like the woman in that video). And the leader they voted for, he's also a conservative. And if Iran's history repeats itself. IF this revolution suceeds, and the new leader is installed. He will betray those who got him into power, fearing them. And put them to death as enemies to the state. And then solidify his own base as yet another tyrant. Sorry I'm a cynic. I hope that the revolution is a TRUE sucess. That the people get a true and lasting voice in their government, and that their government becomes subject to their will, and stays that way. And that this leader doesn't decide, once he's fermented a revolution and won power, that the revolutionary forces are now a threat to HIS rule, and therefore must be eliminated.Date: 6/20/2009 4:12:38 PM
Author: DiaGem
Six days since this post...Date: 6/14/2009 3:57:34 PM
Author: DiaGem
You are right..., the odds are against (big time)..., but could you imagine?Date: 6/14/2009 4:56:37 AM
Author: Gypsy
I wish. But I doubt it. The religious leader of the country has certified the results, giving their blessing to the fixed election. If the population rebells they will be facing the entire religious and political force of the country against them. And this is a country that is just limping toward recovery after decades of bloody war that decimated their population, especially their male population in their 20's and 30's. So your talking about a lot of women rebelling against the physical and ideological might of a mysogonistic regime. It would either have to be a huge revolution. Or it would indeed be 'mini' because anyone daring to participate would be immediately killed as an example and warning to others.
Can you imagine????
Date: 6/23/2009 2:00:20 PM
Author: Gypsy
And if Iran's history repeats itself. IF this revolution suceeds, and the new leader is installed. He will betray those who got him into power, fearing them. And put them to death as enemies to the state. And then solidify his own base as yet another tyrant.
Not cynic..., realistic...Date: 6/23/2009 2:00:20 PM
Author: Gypsy
Yes. I can now. It''s so painful to be hoping for something to happen which causes so much pain to so many (like the woman in that video). And the leader they voted for, he''s also a conservative. And if Iran''s history repeats itself. IF this revolution suceeds, and the new leader is installed. He will betray those who got him into power, fearing them. And put them to death as enemies to the state. And then solidify his own base as yet another tyrant. Sorry I''m a cynic. I hope that the revolution is a TRUE sucess. That the people get a true and lasting voice in their government, and that their government becomes subject to their will, and stays that way. And that this leader doesn''t decide, once he''s fermented a revolution and won power, that the revolutionary forces are now a threat to HIS rule, and therefore must be eliminated.Date: 6/20/2009 4:12:38 PM
Author: DiaGem
Six days since this post...Date: 6/14/2009 3:57:34 PM
Author: DiaGem
You are right..., the odds are against (big time)..., but could you imagine?Date: 6/14/2009 4:56:37 AM
Author: Gypsy
I wish. But I doubt it. The religious leader of the country has certified the results, giving their blessing to the fixed election. If the population rebells they will be facing the entire religious and political force of the country against them. And this is a country that is just limping toward recovery after decades of bloody war that decimated their population, especially their male population in their 20''s and 30''s. So your talking about a lot of women rebelling against the physical and ideological might of a mysogonistic regime. It would either have to be a huge revolution. Or it would indeed be ''mini'' because anyone daring to participate would be immediately killed as an example and warning to others.
Can you imagine????
I said this exact same thing. Verbatim today, Deb. IMO they replaced a monarchy with a theocracy last time they revolted (exchanging one tyrant for another) and now are either going to fail or repeat the more of the same. I do not see how a theocracy can co-exist with a democracy. Ultimately, someone has to have the power... if it's the people, then politically at least, the clerics must be subject to their rule, and if if it's the clerics, then the people do not truly have a voice. It's sad. It would be be truly interesting to see if they COULD meld a theocracy with a democracy, into a system of checks and balances where perhaps the clerics are like our supreme court. But that would take REMARKABLE leadership, vision, and will. It's also a fantasy, at least now.Date: 6/23/2009 3:52:03 PM
Author: AGBF
All of them agree on the principle of a theocracracy and an Islamic republic. I do not see how that can co-exist with democracy,![]()