newbie124
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2007
- Messages
- 584
Hi AllieLuv,
I don''t live in the Boston area so unfortunately can''t help you w/ specific reqs, but scanning through the photos of both photographers, I don''t know if I''m really wowed by either. I do think the first one who you had the e-session with is better than the 2nd person. The Catch Life photographer had some nice colors to his photos when he left them in their naturally lit stage...but his Photoshop skills seem to be a bit off to me. Like the colors and highlighting in some of the modified images are just odd.
I don''t think you have to love the majority of photos that the photographer takes...like others said, you will probably only be printing out a few anyway and 50% isn''t too bad, if you really like those 50. Have you by any chance seen at least one or two full portfolios from this photographer? All photos from a single session?
I think anyone can go out w/ a camera and come back w/ enough decent to very good pictures to post as samples in an online gallery. It''s much more telling when you take a look at a complete set (that being said, I will warn you that looking at complete sets can also make you a little less confident b/c you''re seeing all the mediocre pics that are usually edited out...that''s why I think blogs are also very useful b/c you get to see some wider and less formal samples of their work.)
Anyway, if it''s of any help, here are e-photos from my photographer''s portfolio: http://www.hystudio.com/engagement1/. One reason why this photographer initially caught my eye was b/c of how natural all of the couples look in most of their e-photos, which made me think he must have some talent for making people feel at ease and/or the ability to capture good moments. The photographers I ruled out were ones that, to me, had a lot of cheesy or more "forced" e-pics. It''s funny but in a way, I often found it to be more telling than looking through their wedding portfolios...
I don''t live in the Boston area so unfortunately can''t help you w/ specific reqs, but scanning through the photos of both photographers, I don''t know if I''m really wowed by either. I do think the first one who you had the e-session with is better than the 2nd person. The Catch Life photographer had some nice colors to his photos when he left them in their naturally lit stage...but his Photoshop skills seem to be a bit off to me. Like the colors and highlighting in some of the modified images are just odd.
I don''t think you have to love the majority of photos that the photographer takes...like others said, you will probably only be printing out a few anyway and 50% isn''t too bad, if you really like those 50. Have you by any chance seen at least one or two full portfolios from this photographer? All photos from a single session?
I think anyone can go out w/ a camera and come back w/ enough decent to very good pictures to post as samples in an online gallery. It''s much more telling when you take a look at a complete set (that being said, I will warn you that looking at complete sets can also make you a little less confident b/c you''re seeing all the mediocre pics that are usually edited out...that''s why I think blogs are also very useful b/c you get to see some wider and less formal samples of their work.)
Anyway, if it''s of any help, here are e-photos from my photographer''s portfolio: http://www.hystudio.com/engagement1/. One reason why this photographer initially caught my eye was b/c of how natural all of the couples look in most of their e-photos, which made me think he must have some talent for making people feel at ease and/or the ability to capture good moments. The photographers I ruled out were ones that, to me, had a lot of cheesy or more "forced" e-pics. It''s funny but in a way, I often found it to be more telling than looking through their wedding portfolios...