amc80
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5,765
I'm hoping someone on here can shed some light on a problem I'm having regarding FMLA.
I'm due with our first baby in August. The plan all along as been for me to take 6-8 weeks off (as covered by my employer's disability plan) and for my husband to take 12 weeks off. He has thousands of hours of sick time accrued, which he was planning on using for this time. A new baby is clearly covered under FMLA.
He is a deputy sheriff and it's fairly common for new dads in his department to take the full 12 weeks and use their sick time. I know FMLA only provides for unpaid leave, and whether or not sick/vacation time can be used is up to the employer. DH's department's contract states that "Employees may use sick leave subject to the requirements of the FMLA." All that had been required before is a doctor's note confirming the pregnancy, along with an estimated due date. This is originally what DH was told by the HR director.
Now, HR wants my doctor to complete the standard FMLA form. The problem is that my doctor is filling out the form as MY doctor, not the baby's doctor. As such, it states how much time DH will need to take care of me (2 weeks), not the baby. HR is saying that my doctor needs to state that DH needs 12 weeks to take care of the baby. But my OB isn't the baby's doctor. And I don't really see how the form could be filled out for the baby anyway (by the pediatrician) seeing how he's not even born.
Shouldn't the combined facts of 1) the doctor has authenticated that we are having a baby, and the due date, and 2) the fact that DH's contract allows for use of sick leave for FMLA, be sufficient?
I'd love to hear from anyone who can offer some sort of insight.
I'm due with our first baby in August. The plan all along as been for me to take 6-8 weeks off (as covered by my employer's disability plan) and for my husband to take 12 weeks off. He has thousands of hours of sick time accrued, which he was planning on using for this time. A new baby is clearly covered under FMLA.
He is a deputy sheriff and it's fairly common for new dads in his department to take the full 12 weeks and use their sick time. I know FMLA only provides for unpaid leave, and whether or not sick/vacation time can be used is up to the employer. DH's department's contract states that "Employees may use sick leave subject to the requirements of the FMLA." All that had been required before is a doctor's note confirming the pregnancy, along with an estimated due date. This is originally what DH was told by the HR director.
Now, HR wants my doctor to complete the standard FMLA form. The problem is that my doctor is filling out the form as MY doctor, not the baby's doctor. As such, it states how much time DH will need to take care of me (2 weeks), not the baby. HR is saying that my doctor needs to state that DH needs 12 weeks to take care of the baby. But my OB isn't the baby's doctor. And I don't really see how the form could be filled out for the baby anyway (by the pediatrician) seeing how he's not even born.
Shouldn't the combined facts of 1) the doctor has authenticated that we are having a baby, and the due date, and 2) the fact that DH's contract allows for use of sick leave for FMLA, be sufficient?
I'd love to hear from anyone who can offer some sort of insight.