Did Rice commit a crime?

[ruby59]

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...commit-a-crime-its-starting-to-look-that-way/

But what suggests that the Trump team members caught in this spy web weren't merely "incidental," but were actually the targets of the operation, is that Rice reportedly ordered spreadsheets "prepared" of the phone calls involving Trump, his aides and transition officials. This suggests that, contrary to Rice's assertion, they were being targeted. It's evidence of intent, basically.

 

[Dancing Fire]

Dems. committed a crime?...

. Do you really expect PSer Dems. to reply on this topic?...

 

[E B]

Only a congressional investigation can get to the bottom of this, just as during Watergate. Let's get going.

Do it! DO IT! So far, lots of !!!!!! from RWNJ media, and yet...crickets from the people actually capable of investigating. Why? You know the president can declassify this information, right?

 

[E B]

http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2017/04/05/lead-raju-trump-rice-maybe-committed-crime-live.cnn

I do wonder which will be the magic 'blue lie' that'll finally break things for him. At some point, he needs to be held accountable for leveling accusations without providing evidence. This isn't angry grandpa with his TV dinner in front of Fox, it's our CoC.

 

[ruby59]

http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2017/04/05/lead-raju-trump-rice-maybe-committed-crime-live.cnn

I do wonder which will be the magic 'blue lie' that'll finally break things for him. At some point, he needs to be held accountable for leveling accusations without providing evidence. This isn't angry grandpa with his TV dinner in front of Fox, it's our CoC.

Did you read the link I provided? This was not Rice's job to unmask. And why did she have a spreadsheet on Trump?

 

[E B]

Did you read the link I provided? This was not Rice's job to unmask. And why did she have a spreadsheet on Trump?

I did, but a lot of that information appears to be a) incorrect and b) assumption. AFAIK she is well within her right to request unmasking, but it had to be granted by the relevant IA for legitimate purposes. Which is probably why the WH is being evasive about said 'evidence.' If the unmasking was granted, that doesn't exactly bode well for Team Trump.

Can you link me to a more neutral source with info on these "spreadsheets"? The only reporting I'm seeing is from the Washington Times and Breitbart.

 

[ruby59]

To be honest I never know which outlets the other side will accept.

Mine are always described as inaccurate then someone will link Mother Jones.

I can only go by what I am hearing, and CNN and MSNBC have largely stayed away from the topic.

I am referencing a series lawyers who have come on Fox and I do not think they would risk their credibility by speaking nonsense.