Gypsy
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 40,353
i am the wrong guy to ask about lady's watches.Gypsy|1342080029|3232744 said:Not available right now. I'm wondering if they discontinued it. Drat them.
Is it a good watch DF?
TG..convince her to buy a mechanical..TravelingGal|1342118458|3232920 said:Gypsy, if it's a quartz watch, it will tell time just fine. You're paying for the brand, materials and looks at that point. So "good" is kind of irrelevant.
VRBeauty|1342121707|3232939 said:Over $3,000 for a stainless steel case and quartz mechanism??? Yikes!
I'd be looking for a fine vintage watch with that budget - but Gypsy already knows that!![]()
why can't you fall in love with a mechanical watch?Gypsy|1342245031|3233682 said:VRBeauty|1342121707|3232939 said:Over $3,000 for a stainless steel case and quartz mechanism??? Yikes!
I'd be looking for a fine vintage watch with that budget - but Gypsy already knows that!![]()
I know, but I fell in love with it.
Jennifer I would sell you my rug in a heartbeat. I want it to go to a good home.
OH LAWDIE -- FANTASTIC!!!! Dream watch for sure!!!!! Is that rose gold, though? Grrrrr. Can't tell. If it's yellow, I'd have to pass LOL. (As if it's even an option for me right now!)TravelingGal|1342318497|3234101 said:Gypsy, 2K for a watch designer I've never heard of? Ay, no. I had to look the designer up and saw they were on yelp. One review on their watches and not positive.
http://www.yelp.com/biz/georg-jensen-new-york-3
If you have to have quartz and would spend 3K, I would spend it on a secondhard cartier or something. That will at least hold value.
Go check timezone's sales corner and type in "Ladies" if you are interested. For instance, there is a cartier panter 2 tone that is $1000. Or a Rolex 2 tone datejust for $2300.
And if I were to pick something? JLC Reverso Duetto, $4300, comes with bracelet, steel strap and deployant buckle. AND all the papers. AND diamonds. It looks mint, and it if looked good on my wrist, I'd probably sell my own watch to get it (it was my dream watch for ages, but I have to say, it looks crap on my tiny wrist.)
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tree&goto=6216954&rid=0
and the seller is a very honest guy. TG, I can imagine that JLC on your wrist..TravelingGal|1342318652|3234102 said:and btw, that JLC above watch is TIMELESS. If you want a watch that jewelry lovers AND watch snobs seem to hold in high esteem, get that JLC.
Dancing Fire|1342320552|3234120 said:and the seller is a very honest guy. TG, I can imagine that JLC on your wrist..TravelingGal|1342318652|3234102 said:and btw, that JLC above watch is TIMELESS. If you want a watch that jewelry lovers AND watch snobs seem to hold in high esteem, get that JLC.![]()
Gypsy|1342323720|3234141 said:Don'tkillme, I don't like the JLC. I like JLC as a brand and would love a watch by them, but I don't care for that particular style. The Lady Reverso is more appealing to me but I still don't really care for it.
MIss Pasha by Cartier is okay. Does that come in manual? But really the only Cartier I like is the Tank Americaine and that's way out of budget, even used.
And why do I want manual anyway? I've never understood what that's considered better.
I really care about the appearance about the watch. For me it's a piece of jewelry. I know that's not what watch lovers look at, but I'm not a watch lover. I just want one nice 'forever' watch.
decodelighted|1342326541|3234161 said:I know the *watch* is steel ... but on the reverse side there's some color of gold "trim" surrounding the face and on the hands ... can't tell if it's rose gold (LOVE) or yellow gold (LOATHE).
So beeeutiful! I'm kinda in a masculine watch phase though. For xmas I got a swiss submariner "in the style" of the Rolex original. Debaufre. 2nd hand. For a steal. It's the 39mm and heavy-like-tank ... but I just super dig the look & feel all dainty like w/a big ol' luggy men's watch on. (Which is hard to do since I'm 5 ft 9+ and, uh, curvy). ADORE the contrast between my antique delicate yet sturdy e-ring set w/ the matte-ish band & black face. So D.E.C.O. in a way. Anyhoo ...
JLC is class(ic). But Gyp's gotta buy what SHE loves. Or else it's no better than the dastardly rug!
Dancing Fire|1342329202|3234178 said:[quote="TravelingGal|
The reason why a mechanical watch is considered "better" is the work that goes into making one! But even then, a lot of automatic watches out there are powered by a "stock standard" ETA movement. Quartz though, to a watch lover, has no "soul." It''s a battery and a computer chip. There's no art to telling time.
Gypsy|1342328983|3234176 said:Dastardly rug. LMAO. Perfect.
So... here's what I'm getting:
If I can find the Bedat I like second hand in good condition, and at a proper discount, it might be worth it. Same with the Oval Chopard (I really adore that watch).
I'll keep looking for a vintage mechanical I like (there have been some, as VR knows that I've loved). There was a vintage JLC that I let go (stupidly) with a pear face that was just gorgeous. I regret that. I wore my MIL's vintage JLC on my wedding day. So I really would like one of my own.
Longines, I agree with you T-gal. And I really don't want one by them. But I like the torneau shape and it had the mechanical so I thought I'd post it.